Clay vs Iron Building Sewer in Chicago

Users who are viewing this thread

ChiTownBlues

New Member
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Chicago, Il
Hi All,
I have a question about what is proper and what is code as it pertains to a building sewer repair in Chicago, and can use the forum’s expertise. I just had sewer work done in my basement for a renovation three years ago and I am already having problems with the sewer line, namely leaking water at the floor connection.
Backstory: My clay building sewer had long been partially separated just below the floor at the 90. As you know, the bill to constantly cut roots out along the whole 125 year old line is substantial so the plumber proposed we replace the first 8’ feet of clay below concrete floor to replace worst (loose) sections and to chop out 5” root trunks from the dirt around pipes. He also spec’d out a 6” pvc clean out to rise above the floor to get 6” cutters for future maintenance. In terms of material he used clay to match existing clay sewer and this was extended up through the foundation and transitioned to pvc at floor level. Seemed all good to me at the time. Except a year later waste water began leaking through cracks in the clay spigot end (between mortar and spigot). Bad.
Plumber removed mortar and found the spigot/bell part had cracked. Maybe the Hvac guys bumped it while replacing the furnace weeks earlier? I don’t know. Anyways this seems like a poor design to have such a fragile joint for such an important function. Furthermore, I found he had made seam between clay and pvc with oakum and mortar. The male pvc sitting on top of clay spigot. Seems like another questionable thing as well don’t imagine pvc is made to fit into clay without some sort of special adapter.
This seam was replaced twice since and still continues to leak. Once with mortar (lasted 6 months) and most recently with epoxy (lasted 9 months). Thoughts?
When I questioned the design (using clay) he said he was following the strict Chicago municipal code. Thanks for weighing in here.
 

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,178
Reaction score
4,732
Points
113
Location
IL
The male pvc sitting on top of clay spigot. Seems like another questionable thing as well don’t imagine pvc is made to fit into clay without some sort of special adapter.
This adapter looks kinda special to me. I am not a plumber. It think it is made to adapt to cast iron rather than clay, however. Clay sewers are not good IMO.

index.php
 

ChiTownBlues

New Member
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Chicago, Il
This adapter looks kinda special to me. I am not a plumber. It think it is made to adapt to cast iron rather than clay, however. Clay sewers are not good IMO.

index.php
Hey Reach4, thanks for replying. There is actually no adapter. The pvc male end is sitting like an 1/8” above the clay spigot end. The clay spigot as you can see is damaged. First a minor crack and then compounded when plumber removed and replaced leaking mortar joint.

Anyone else have a common on what is proper here? Should the clay building sewer have transitioned to iron? Obviously iron won’t fail in the manner clay did in this case. And I’m guessing the transition to pvc should use an adapter (and not rely on a cement joint)?
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks