(206) 949-5683, Top Rated Plumber, Seattle
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Cadet 3 Flowise Flush Review

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Arrow Cadet 3 Flowise Flush Review


    Works ok I think for most people's standards.

  2. #2
    Brand New Plumber GoKohlerGo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    65

    Talking I Agree

    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron Fields View Post

    Works ok I think for most people's standards.
    I have had extremely good experience with these toilets too. I recommended it to my uncle who was looking for a toilet and so far, he is VERY IMPRESSED. I have gone over there to test it (not to ''do my business'') but just to flush a bunch of toilet paper down it and it took it all. I even put 150 sheets in there and it still went down. So I agree with you, this is a very good toilet.
    Am now a plumber! GoKohlerGo!

  3. #3
    DIY Junior Member chrisf8657's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    24

    Default

    I reviewed this model.
    Since installing it years ago, I have never clogged it, but then I hold the handle down for a full flush. Came right on the borderline (bowl filled all the way) a couple days ago but at the last second it went down (was very constipated after 5 days).

    No leaks, no problems so far.
    Terry and others have encountered problems with the china not being up to par, but if you get a good set that isn't chipped, etc. you've got a great toilet.

  4. #4
    Forum Admin, Expert Plumber Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Bothell, Washington
    Posts
    14,191
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Terry and others have encountered problems with the china not being up to par, but if you get a good set that isn't chipped, etc.
    That kind of matters to plumbers. When you are picking up the product and garranteeing the product, it matters.

    If you can "live" with the defects as a homeowner I get that. Not all of the customers are that forgiving though. And if we have to return and exchange a bowl or a tank, the time lost is one more job I could have done that day and gotten paid for. For those of you that do this on your own home, on weekends, and just love going back and forth to the store exchanging pieces and talking to the girls at the counter, all I have to say to that is, "My weekends are for skiing." And my workdays "have" to be productive. I try to sell product that never needs exchanging, because "my time is money"

    For example; One of my supplies switched brands on tempering valves for water heaters. They went from Honeywell to Apollo. So the last two installs, both Apollo valves meant three return trips. Each trip cost me an hour in lost plumbing calls. The hourly money I lost was five times the cost of the valve. There was no cost difference between the two valves, but I was out what I would have made on three service calls.

    So for a homeower with low expectations about time and quality, I say you get what you pay for.

    I hold the handle down for a full flush.
    Pretty much any toilet made will flush well if you drain the tank by holding the handle down. A good bowl will flush with 1.28 gallons. They don't need 3.5 gallons.

  5. #5
    Retired Defense Industry Engineer jadnashua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    21,374

    Default

    FWIW, the rubber parts in that toilet won't last long with that cleaner sitting in the tank...
    Jim DeBruycker
    Important note - I'm not a pro
    Retired Defense Industry Engineer; Schluter 2.5-day Workshop Completed 2013, 2014

  6. #6
    In the Trades Gary Swart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Yakima WA
    Posts
    7,244

    Default

    I was hoping the blue cleaner was just for demonstrating the flush. Is not, get rid of it. That stuff contains bleach which eats the hell out of all the rubber parts. To the gentleman who always holds the handle down to get a complete flush, when you do that, you are defeating the low flow feature. More over, you are indicating to me that the toilet doesn't flush very well. My Toto Drake and Toto Dartmouth have never, ever, required more that the basic flush.

Similar Threads

  1. Review: Cadet 3 EL Flowise Toilet
    By chrisf8657 in forum Toilet Forum discussions
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-17-2011, 03:29 AM
  2. AS Cadet 3 Flowise versus AS Dual Flush Eco Fusion
    By jpearl in forum Toilet Forum discussions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-05-2011, 10:48 PM
  3. Any experience with Cadet FloWise 1.1 GPF Pressure Assist?
    By FargoFan in forum Toilet Forum discussions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-01-2010, 10:52 AM
  4. Making a Flowise? - Bricking the Cadet 3 from 1.6 gpf down to 1.28
    By RickS in forum Toilet Forum discussions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-28-2010, 06:35 AM
  5. American Standard Cadet Flowise Toilet -- any good?
    By BettyG in forum Toilet Forum discussions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-05-2009, 04:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •