Solar single wall heat exchangers

Users who are viewing this thread

Inspektor Ludwig

Journeyman/Inspector
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
In the good ol' UPC
I came across this the other day on a jobsite and had to do a little research. A guy had a Solar heat exchanger installed by a professional company that specializes in this type of system. The problem was the single wall heat exchanger. The company used Propylene Glycol saying it was non-toxic but the msds gave it a "1" for health. The UPC prohibits toxic substances in heat exchangers unless it is double walled. So I had do some research and found out that the Propylene Glycol cannot be used in a single wall exchanger because it IS toxic. The company said that they've never been called on it before and the package says "non-toxic" so what's the big deal. The UPC references some old archaic toxicology book that we had to find to confirm the code call. What a pain in the arse! So the company is now going to use a Glycerin based antifreeze and since Glycerin is ok by code we have to allow it. I can't seem to find what the other ingredients are, probably proprietary information, but still, I don't know if I'd want something that's going to make me just a "little" sick even close to my potable water. Now I'm wondering how many of those systems have been installed with Propylene Glycol? Any thoughts on this one?
(shoulder shrug)
 

frankflynn

New Member
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Palo Alto, CA.
So was this a closed loop? I'm thinking that if there was a leak in the heat exchanger the domestic hot water is under pressure and would fill then over fill the Glycerin / Glycol side then flood the basement or spew from the roof. At any rate it would be notices and the problem would not be Glycol getting into the domestic water but domestic water getting out.
 

Dana

In the trades
Messages
7,889
Reaction score
511
Points
113
Location
01609
So was this a closed loop? I'm thinking that if there was a leak in the heat exchanger the domestic hot water is under pressure and would fill then over fill the Glycerin / Glycol side then flood the basement or spew from the roof. At any rate it would be notices and the problem would not be Glycol getting into the domestic water but domestic water getting out.

You're presuming that the potable water pressure will always be higher than the glcol loop. Experience indicates otherwise, independently of the installer- pre-charged pressure or PRV settings on the glycol loop.
 

peter_

New Member
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
NYC, US
Website
www.brazetek.com
I came across this the other day on a jobsite and had to do a little research. A guy had a Solar heat exchanger installed by a professional company that specializes in this type of system. The problem was the single wall heat exchanger. The company used Propylene Glycol saying it was non-toxic but the msds gave it a "1" for health. The UPC prohibits toxic substances in heat exchangers unless it is double walled. So I had do some research and found out that the Propylene Glycol cannot be used in a single wall exchanger because it IS toxic. The company said that they've never been called on it before and the package says "non-toxic" so what's the big deal. Now I'm wondering how many of those systems have been installed with Propylene Glycol? Any thoughts on this one?
(shoulder shrug)

Generally, you don't need double wall heat exchanger unless you have potable water on one of the sides in your system. For example, in radiant heating systems for snow melt is widely used 30%-40% propylene glycol mix. Does it means you need a double wall heat exchanger? ...

How old was that solar system?

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Will getting a new heat exchanger solve the problem?
www.brazetek.com/products
www.flatplate.com
 

mkiernan

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Oklahoma
You can use propylene glycol in single walled heat exchangers so long as the unit is marked with class 1 substance as recommended by the fda and ipc and the unit is UL listed. the fda website goes into a little more detail but it will meet code.
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks