MarkusMarkus
New Member
Hello all,
I purchased a townhouse a couple of years ago which already had a tankless water heater, a Takagi unit which uses direct venting through 4" PVC for both its intake and exhaust. The original installer *did not* install the flush valves needed for regular maintenance (descaling), and the previous owners surely never had the unit properly serviced as it is now prematurely on its last legs with hard water mineral buildup in the heat exchanger. The first signs were leaks springing from inside the chassis, and a licensed installer came out and confirmed this, so unfortunately the whole thing needs to be replaced.
I'm going to have it replaced with a Navien 240A, but here's the rub -- the Navien wants 2"-3" diameter PVC for its intake and exhaust, but the Takagi used 4" for both so that's the existing infrastructure. Naturally I'd prefer to use that existing venting rather than tear into the ceiling between the unit and where that venting reaches the exterior (probably 25' and running through 3 bends if I were to guess).
Navien specifies 3" max diameter for the venting. If I had the installer run 2" venting to and from the unit but then converting to the existing 4" venting above the ceiling, let's say five feet up, what risks am I taking? It's of course easy to understand why reducing to a smaller diameter vent would be bad, and most venting issues I find online concern blockages, but I've not found any explanations as to why going to a larger vent diameter to the exterior might be problematic.
Is it a turbulence issue for the intake side (i.e. incoming air going from 4" down to 2" before entering the unit), or something not ideal on the exhaust side (going from 2" to 4")? My plan would be to have the installer use 2" PVC as far as possible before it meets the existing 4" so that we're not going from large diameter to small immediately before it enters the unit.
Thanks very much for your input and expertise.
I purchased a townhouse a couple of years ago which already had a tankless water heater, a Takagi unit which uses direct venting through 4" PVC for both its intake and exhaust. The original installer *did not* install the flush valves needed for regular maintenance (descaling), and the previous owners surely never had the unit properly serviced as it is now prematurely on its last legs with hard water mineral buildup in the heat exchanger. The first signs were leaks springing from inside the chassis, and a licensed installer came out and confirmed this, so unfortunately the whole thing needs to be replaced.
I'm going to have it replaced with a Navien 240A, but here's the rub -- the Navien wants 2"-3" diameter PVC for its intake and exhaust, but the Takagi used 4" for both so that's the existing infrastructure. Naturally I'd prefer to use that existing venting rather than tear into the ceiling between the unit and where that venting reaches the exterior (probably 25' and running through 3 bends if I were to guess).
Navien specifies 3" max diameter for the venting. If I had the installer run 2" venting to and from the unit but then converting to the existing 4" venting above the ceiling, let's say five feet up, what risks am I taking? It's of course easy to understand why reducing to a smaller diameter vent would be bad, and most venting issues I find online concern blockages, but I've not found any explanations as to why going to a larger vent diameter to the exterior might be problematic.
Is it a turbulence issue for the intake side (i.e. incoming air going from 4" down to 2" before entering the unit), or something not ideal on the exhaust side (going from 2" to 4")? My plan would be to have the installer use 2" PVC as far as possible before it meets the existing 4" so that we're not going from large diameter to small immediately before it enters the unit.
Thanks very much for your input and expertise.