Gary Slusser
That's all folks!
- Messages
- 6,921
- Reaction score
- 22
- Points
- 38
- Location
- Wherever I park the motorhome.
- Website
- www.qualitywaterassociates.com
The only thing I questioned in the Technopure system SISU mentioned was the use of ionization on potable water. For all I know it may work very well and I'm not much into assuming when I have no information to back up the assumption... but that doesn't apply to some others here.
He told me in a phone call yesterday that there was an ionizer then a 2.0 cuft Birm filter (within limits it is used for iron removal) and a 2.0 cuft carbon filter and then another ionizer. IMO the system wouldn't have worked because his water has IRB and H2S gas in it. But thinking now, possibly the ionization may have a negative impact on the IRB but IMO it wouldn't oxidize the H2S and Birm can not be used with H2S in the water. So he bought an inline erosion pellet chlorination system, Centaur carbon filter and softener with Clack WS-1 valves from me but... for all I know the Technopure system could work very well on a different water. I do know that ionization water treatment was invented by NASA chemists and engineers.
He told me in a phone call yesterday that there was an ionizer then a 2.0 cuft Birm filter (within limits it is used for iron removal) and a 2.0 cuft carbon filter and then another ionizer. IMO the system wouldn't have worked because his water has IRB and H2S gas in it. But thinking now, possibly the ionization may have a negative impact on the IRB but IMO it wouldn't oxidize the H2S and Birm can not be used with H2S in the water. So he bought an inline erosion pellet chlorination system, Centaur carbon filter and softener with Clack WS-1 valves from me but... for all I know the Technopure system could work very well on a different water. I do know that ionization water treatment was invented by NASA chemists and engineers.