Toto Ultramax II vs. Kohler Santa Rosa

Users who are viewing this thread

dannehboy

New Member
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Las Vegas
Hi, I am looking to purchase 3 units of one of these toilets, I just can't decide which. My highest priority is that it is as difficult as possible to clog. However, I do care about other things such as price, ease of cleaning, anti-stick coatings (e.g., Cefiontech, etc.). Based on my research, I have the following pros for each toilet:

Toto Ultramax II Pros:
- Cefiontech coating may perform better than Kohler's coating (not really based on anything solid)
- Trapway shape has more gradual bends which I've seen it suggested is meaningful in terms of avoiding clogs
- Overall better reputation for flushes (though not really based on anything solid as far as I can tell)

Kohler Santa Rosa Pros:
- About $100 cheaper per unit for the version with ContinuousClean (approx $470) (I don't mind spending more but worth taking into account)
-ContinuousClean feature: As far as I can tell this feature allows you to put a cleaning tab in your tank without the tablets negatively affecting the hardware in the tank. It seems that Kohler's coating isn't harmed by bleach as they seem to allow you to use bleach tabletss for this feature

As far as cleaning goes, they both seem to be more or less identical. As far as I can tell Santa Rosa seems to have the tornado type flush that Ultramax II has so they both benefit from good coverage during flush and don't have the water coming out of the rim for keeping-it-clean purposes. I'm assuming Ultramax II has the better flush and perhaps better quality control (maybe?), but Kohler's significantly cheaper price and ContinuousClean feature are making me wonder if the Ultramax II is worth it.

I'm quite OCD about cleanliness and toilet clogs kinda freak me out so if there if it is meaningfully less likely that the Ultramax II will clogs, then I don't mind spending the money, but if it isn't clear, then I may lean towards the Santa Rosa as the ContinuousClean feature seems quite appealing.

I would appreciate any input.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:

Master Plumber Mark

Sensitivity trainer and plumber of mens souls
Messages
5,783
Reaction score
454
Points
83
Location
indianapolis indiana - land of the free, home of
Website
www.weilhammerplumbing.com
The common toto Drake just seems to be a better quality toilet... the parts are better and easy to repair
very easy indeed... and of course if you shit something larger than golf balls for turds they
will not stop up the toilet.....

The brass bolts that mount the tank to the bowl are actually much better on the Toto
than the shitty compression grommet plug type "dog shit leaking junk bolts"
that Kohler supplies you with and expects you to struggle with.... I refuse to use them




shopping


Its very frustrating to always have to modify those Kohler toilets with my own tank
to bowl bolts with solid washers and nuts that
never leak just to be extra sure and confident that they will not leak on me some day
especially on the second floor of someone's house

I would guess that they are close to the same price...
I really dont know for sure.... but the Toto quality is much more desireable
 
Last edited:
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks