Shut off valve before or after pressure tank?

Users who are viewing this thread

bco2jco

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Hello,
I am installing a new diaphragm pressure tank. I purchased a pipe "T" kit as a package. It includes pipe T, connecting fittings, pressure switch, pressure gauge, drain valve, relief valve, and a shut off valve.

I will be installing it myself and I am pretty familiar with the system and confident i can do it correctly. My question is where should the shut off valve be placed? Should the shut off valve be before the tank (between the pump and the tank) or after the tank (between the tank and house supply)? Are there compelling reasons for one location vs the other? I am thinking it should be after the tank.
Thanks for your help.
 

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,795
Reaction score
4,413
Points
113
Location
IL
After the pressure tank!

The compelling reason is what would happen if somebody closed the valve while the breaker is on.

To shut off the water before the pressure tank, just open the breaker (or switch if you have one).
 

bco2jco

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Yeah, that makes sense.
The somebody to close the valve and forget to reopen it would be me!
Thanks.
 

Valveman

Cary Austin
Staff member
Messages
14,599
Reaction score
1,296
Points
113
Location
Lubbock, Texas
Website
cyclestopvalves.com
It is also good to have a shut off valve after the pressure tank and a hose bib on the tank. This is good for trouble shooting when there is a problem. While you are figuring all of this out you should study why a Cycle Stop Valve should be on the inlet of that tank tee you are installing.
 

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,795
Reaction score
4,413
Points
113
Location
IL
Hose bib on the tank is also important for flushing sediment. Flushing sediment I think should be initially annual unless you have a lot of sediment or almost no sediment.

Similarly, checking the air precharge annually is a good initial schedule, although you may find that can go longer if your tank has an all-butyl diaphragm.
 

Sarg

Enjoy Learning
Messages
227
Reaction score
51
Points
28
Location
Upstate New York
CSV1A.JPG
 

LLigetfa

DIYer, not in the trades
Messages
7,497
Reaction score
575
Points
113
Location
NW Ontario, Canada
IMHO it is a mistake to reduce the pipe size on the outlet side of the Tee. Also, right angles should be avoided where possible. Long sweeping bends are better. Don't get hung up on it looking pretty.

Low pressure cut-off switches are a nuisance and offer a false sense of security rather than protection.
 

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,795
Reaction score
4,413
Points
113
Location
IL
IMHO it is a mistake to reduce the pipe size on the outlet side of the Tee. Also, right angles should be avoided where possible. Long sweeping bends are better. Don't get hung up on it looking pretty.
I disagree on that first sentence. A 1-1/4 tank tee with one inch out, or even 3/4 piping (if a small house) out, is perfectly normal. A 1-1/4 tank tee typically has 1 inch FIP threads, in addition to 1-1/4 MIP threads. The tank tee offers very low resistance between the pressure tank and the pressure switch. Generally, if your precharged pressure tank is 34 gallon or larger, and if you use a tank tee, then that tank tee would be a 1-1/4 inch tank tee.

Up to 32 gallons, if you use a tank tee, it would be a 1 inch tank tee. That would have 3/4 FIP threads plus 1 inch MIP threads.

Right angle elbows in pressure piping are perfectly normal. I agree that a straight pex adapter with a pex bend would have a little less pressure drop, but I think the loss is fairly small. If the water will go to a backwashing iron filter, then you want to minimize pressure losses.

I do agree that if using PEX in a typical house, it would be better to use 1 inch PEX up until the water to the water heater splits off. 3/4 pex with crimp/clamp fittings is probably to be avoided out of the tank tee.
 
Last edited:

LLigetfa

DIYer, not in the trades
Messages
7,497
Reaction score
575
Points
113
Location
NW Ontario, Canada
I disagree on that first sentence. A 1-1/4 tank tee with one inch out, or even 3/4 piping (if a small house) out, is perfectly normal. A 1-1/4 tank tee typically has 1 inch FIP threads, in addition to 1-1/4 MIP threads.
I am not talking about the 1 - 1/4" out. The OP has a reducing bushing on the 1" out into which there is a 90 degree elbow into what looks like a PEX B nipple. If using PEX A or B but especially B, I would run 1" to the manifold and I would not use elbows. Why introduce flow restrictions just to have a tidy "look"?
 

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,795
Reaction score
4,413
Points
113
Location
IL
I think that is a MIP to F1807 (brass crimp/clamp) elbow. But I also agree that upping that diameter would be worthwhile if it was not already in service.

Your system needs you to minimize pressure losses more than most. Most users are not on as strict of a PSI budget.

I think you still use the venturi-type micronizer, right?
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks