FloridaOrange said:
I see that. Thankfully my state allows wet vents, common vents, circuit vents, combination vents and gut vents. I think venting every single fixture, while works of course, is unnecessary and puts an extra burden financially on the owner of the building. The other systems work just as well when installed correctly.
The director of the division of plumbing in my state (KY) sees it quite differently as I agree with the sentiment that plumbing systems should be designed to follow
maximum load factors, not
minimum. Plumbing is designed to work error free and when you run waste through a line dedicated for venting, it compromises the risk for vent failure strictly by the changing of the inner dimension by buildup/debi....reactive qualities such as cast iron/copper/galvanized that has a proven history of clogging due to acidic waste from food and detergents that slowly distort it's once smooth inner surface. KY and NY run the roost in the United States for having the strictest plumbing codes to govern by. I'd rather not know any other laxed code.
Anyone that's been in plumbing long enough and seen enough piping situations can also verify that even SCH40 PVC can get inner wall buildup from lack of proper venting....even on a vertical drop. All piping can suffer from this situation because the system is not running error-free either by design (wet venting for sure) or lack of proper maintenance.
FloridaOrange said:
What would you do in a situation of a restaurant with no interior walls in the kitchen and all traps greater than 12' from a wall?
I'd follow KY state code provisions and island/loop vent every one of those fixtures with a minimum 2" drain and 3 cleanouts serving different access points to allow proper cleaning. Anything else IMO is a secondary system that leads to reliability of preventive maintenance to keep it running efficiently. In the theory "Every drain must have a vent" in KY....this allows the system to run in simple fashion without preventive maintenance at all...unless the system is abused or overloaded for whatever reason by the end user.
The statement out financial burden? That's a non-theory in the book of many as the property owner has to have an understanding of what was lost to begin with, what system offers a better design. This isn't of personal choice most times as it is dictated by the local authority in the state they reside in.
FloridaOrange said:
At least what I saw in the KY codebook is 100 times better than what I saw plumbed in GA. Circle traps, unvented....and worse.
When I took my journeyman's in Ohio with my eyes shut, the head honcho Elmer Weil told me I didn't have to do all that venting on the isometric drawing as it was overkill in Ohio. He said it will work but I won't be deducted points for doing so.
I aced that journeyman's test and left the connect-the-dot plumbing to someone else. What's really good is new construction in OH is following KY code closely on their new residential home construction. It was not that way years prior.
I have "issues" with product choices the state of KY allows to be used, along with certain other specifications that should be changed/modified to stop the constant repeat problems they create down the road....affecting the property owner financially. I was able to get enforcement of strapping of expansion tanks in the northern kentucky area.....I'm still working on getting all kitchen sink drains on horizontal runs supported at 2' intervals instead of the norm, 4'. This will solve a true plumbing defect that homes experience within a short few months of use and this is not following the true guildelines of plumbing principles set forth in all of our plumbing codebooks.