The TCNA shower construction guidelines that many codes are built on call for there to be a waterproof, sloped liner, and a vapor barrier behind the walls. There are numerous alternative methods, some substitute a surface membrane or other waterproofing treatment. If a shower is built to those standards, the supporting walls would not get wet even if the tile were not present. None of their approved methods omit a liner and vapor barrier or surface membrane. WIthout those features, any moisture trapped in the pan will wick up the walls and could lead to problems, especially if the grout has failed or there's no caulking where there should be. Again, if it is built to those TCNA guidelines, what you saw would not happen. As noted earlier, my favorite method is a surface membrane (Kerdi), but I would feel comfortable using any of the approved methods. What's paramount is the quality of the workmanship and an approved method (I think FL dropped the ball!). It doesn't really cost much more to do it once per one of the TCNA approved methods, especially when you consider having to redo it to fix the damage caused by a failed install!
I've read of some tests that show moisture will wick as much as 6" up cbu panels when sitting in standing water that can exist with a poorly constructed pan. A major reason why a sloped liner and a vapor barrier are needed in a shower to protect the walls behind. Even with that, if poor workmanship clogged up the drain's weep holes, you can get standing water inside of the pan under the tile.