Terry Love's Plumbing & Remodel DIY forum


Go Back   Terry Love's Plumbing & Remodel DIY forum > Shower & bathtub Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:34 PM
lybern lybern is offline
DIY Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: new york
Posts: 2
Default 3/4 or 1/2 shower?

We are rebuilding our shower. The walls are open and we can do it with 3/4 or 1/2. We are using PEX. I am undecided. On one hand, I like the idea of increased water flow for nice strong showers with 3/4. On the other hand, the 1/2 fixtures are a lot less expensive and there is a lot more choice. Also, we like the idea of conserving water, especially since we have a private well. But, then again, I really like a nice strong shower. Is there any way to get the advantages of 3/4 without the disadvantages (expense)? (My plumber is also making a lot of noise about the idea of using 3/4 - I think that means the price goes up.) Does it make a difference that we want to use PEX? I have just a few hours to make up my mind. I have already bought both 1/2 and 3/4 valves, so I am ready - just don't have a decision! I'd love to have a good understanding of the issues - also if it matters that in the end the arm to the shower head is standard. By the way, we will be using 1 fixed head and 1 hand-held - maybe at the same time occassionally.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-07-2009, 08:29 AM
geniescience's Avatar
geniescience geniescience is offline
Homeowner
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: humid summers hot, humid winters cold
Posts: 1,887
Default

good info given. You seem to have a good grasp.

With only two showerheads, you'll be satisfied with the smallest Pex and the smallest valves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lybern View Post
....I like the idea of increased water flow for nice strong showers with 3/4. ... Also... we have a private well. But, then again, I really like a nice strong shower. ....
1/2" valves are the flow limiting factors. 3/4" Pex is about the same cost and labor, in my opinion. But installing it is not an advantage, it's just a bigger pipe leading to a 1/2" valve connected to two showerheads.

"Strong" shower feeling will be provided by the showerheads.

Pipe diameter is not a limiting factor, with two shower heads.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2009, 09:23 AM
hj's Avatar
hj hj is online now
Moderator & Master Plumber
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 13,483
Default pipe

With most valves the restriction to flow is in the valve itself. That is what determines how much water you get, NOT the pipe size in most cases. Even 3/4" shower valves have openings smaller than a 1/2" copper line, but PEX is smaller than that. With PEX you need 3/4" to approximate the capacity of 1/2" copper.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-07-2009, 01:39 PM
lybern lybern is offline
DIY Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: new york
Posts: 2
Default ID PEX vs. Copper

Is the inside diameter of 3/4 PEX different from the ID of 3/4 copper? I can understand that PEX has thicker walls than copper, but wouldn't the inside diameter be consistant? If not, why not call it what it really is, like 5/8"?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2009, 02:10 PM
hj's Avatar
hj hj is online now
Moderator & Master Plumber
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 13,483
Default pipes

IPS sized pipes ALL have the same o.d. as steel pipe, regardless of what the i.d. is. PEX and all other CTS, (copper tube size), have the o.d. of copper tubing, but the i.d. varies according to the wall thickness. IF the i.d. stayed the same and the o.d. varied, they would have to make different fittings for every grade of pipe.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:07 PM.


all rights reserved, Love Plumbing & Remodel, 1992-2009