Markh
New Member
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I am in the process of replacing an old tub with a retrofit shower base. I removed the old tub and called in a couple of plumbers for estimates on installing the new Swanstone shower base with a Oatey No Calk drain. When the plumbers came out I was informed that I needed to replace the existing 1.5" waste pipe with 2". The estimates I got ranged from 2,000 to 3,000 to replace the pipe back to the vertical stack (only about 3 feet away) WAY MORE than I was prepared to spend for this remodel.
So now I'm considering just installing the base myself. Cutting the existing copper pipe back a bit and then coupling it to a 2" pvc dwv using a 1.5 to 2" converter piece to connect to the shower drain. Or alternately going 1.5" all the way and replacing the rubber gasket in the drain with one for a 1.5" pipe (saw this on Oakey's website).
I know that code says it should be 2" for shower, however I never experienced problems with the tub draining before and I have a shower stall in another bathroom that has only a 1.5" drain pipe (was done when 1.5" was the standard I guess) and have had no problems with that. So, code aside, is there really a problem of doing it this way? Apart from not passing possible inspection if/when I sell the house (assuming they discover it) are there any problems I'm courting here?
So now I'm considering just installing the base myself. Cutting the existing copper pipe back a bit and then coupling it to a 2" pvc dwv using a 1.5 to 2" converter piece to connect to the shower drain. Or alternately going 1.5" all the way and replacing the rubber gasket in the drain with one for a 1.5" pipe (saw this on Oakey's website).
I know that code says it should be 2" for shower, however I never experienced problems with the tub draining before and I have a shower stall in another bathroom that has only a 1.5" drain pipe (was done when 1.5" was the standard I guess) and have had no problems with that. So, code aside, is there really a problem of doing it this way? Apart from not passing possible inspection if/when I sell the house (assuming they discover it) are there any problems I'm courting here?