Terry Loves Bellevue & Kirkland
425-649-5683, Top Rated Plumber 1-877-808-5683
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Trouble with new tub and old (formerly) drum trap drain

  1. #1
    Engineer chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Posts
    339

    Default Trouble with new tub and old (formerly) drum trap drain

    Good day folks. Putting in a new tub. Old one was connected to a drum trap. I've fiddled with plastic p-trap pieces and for the life of me can't figure out how to make it work, with the space provided. The drain line is pretty close to the centerline of the tub tailpiece. I'm pretty sure it is less than what is needed for a p-trap, in order to connect standard sweep 45's and 90's. It is pretty close to the minimum distance for a drum trap.

    Question - are drum traps illegal across the board, or is it a local municipality issue? If I use a brass drum trap, I think I can make it work. The old one is ancient history, I cut it out with a sawzall during demo.

  2. #2
    Engineer chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Another thought for the same issue - what is the proper use of a sanitary tee or long sweep tee? I am thinking of running the vertical vent into the "radius" part of the sanitary tee, with the tub drain entering upstream of the radius. This is essentially what I have now, but instead of a sanitary tee, there is a brass wye. Problem I have is the location of the wye is creating issues in getting the tub drain connected without relocating the vent or wet drain pipe (after the wye) in a major way.

    Here is a thread talking about something similar. I want to put the sanitary tee horizontally, with the sweep arm vertical, or nearly so. The vent would enter the sweep arm from above, and would be directionally correct. The drain would flow through the "straight" (my words) part of the tee.

    http://www.****.com/forum/read.php?1,248812
    Last edited by chassis; 01-16-2007 at 07:33 PM.

  3. #3
    Engineer chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Is this arrangement code compliant? I think it will get me where I want to go. It is a copper p-trap and two street 45s. The tub tailpiece feeds into the p-trap, then the last 45 is connected to a short nipple, then enters the existing DWV wye, where the vent stack joins the drain. This is all 1 1/2" piping. Thanks.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  4. #4
    Plumber Cass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,992

    Default

    If you can shorten the piece coming down from the tub, raise up the trap, and eliminate the 45s then it will work. Do you have a vent there somewhere?

    You don't want to install it the way you are showing it.

    Why arent you using a banded coupling from copper to PVC pipe to PVC trap and up to the waste and overflow with a desanco / trap adaptor?
    Last edited by Cass; 01-21-2007 at 03:25 AM.

  5. #5
    Engineer chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Cass,

    Thanks. I can't raise the trap higher because it's as high as the tailpiece will allow. There is a vent after the trap. Why don't I want to install it as shown, is it a convenience issue or against something in plumbing code? Just trying to understand the situation.

    Another problem I have is there is not much pipe length from the trap to the wye. I want to leave the wye where it is, because moving it means modifying the vent line, which will be a pretty major headache.

  6. #6
    Plumber Cass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,992

    Default

    What will happen if you cut the tail piece shorter?

  7. #7
    Engineer chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Here are some more pics. The first pic shows the copper wye and vent pipe. The tub trap (not shown) goes in the notch in the joist. The wye, as you can see, is just below the top of the joist.

    Second pic shows what I think will work. From the vent line, use a banded coupling to connect the PVC 90 deg. elbow. Then a short length of PVC into the sanitary tee. Upstream of the sanitary tee would be PVC, eventually reaching the tub tailpiece. Downstream of the sanitary tee would be another banded coupling, which connects into the existing copper drain line.

    The two basic questions here are 1. Is this code?, and 2. Will this work? Thanks again for all the assistance.

    p.s. I promise not to use blue tape to glue the fittings together.

    p.p.s. Why don't the images appear automatically? For me they only show up as links.
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  8. #8
    Engineer chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Is this kosher? Here is the setup:

    1. Kohler pop up drain assembly tailpiece
    2. 1 1/2" PVC p-trap
    3. 22.5 degree 1/16 street bend
    4. short 1 1/2" nipple (not visible) on hub end of 1/16 bend, inside of Fernco
    5. 1 1/2" Fernco coupling
    6. cast copper wye (existing)

    The trap arm and existing drain line are about 4 1/4" offset, which is why I needed the 1/16 bend.

    You can see the vent line coming in from the right.

    p.s. I still can't see these photos in the thread, they are shown as links which are only viewable when you click on them. Is there a solution to this?
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    Last edited by chassis; 02-10-2007 at 11:23 AM.

  9. #9
    Moderator & Master Plumber hj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Cave Creek, Arizona
    Posts
    23,523

    Default drain

    1. That Fernco is not approved for that location.
    2. You need a proper "transition" coupling with one side sized for PVC and the other for copper.
    3. I would not use a "union joint" trap in a location like that. The nut joining the two parts can crack and cause a leak.
    4. That short radius trap will cause problems if the drain becomes obstructed and has to be snaked some day.

  10. #10
    Engineer chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Posts
    339

    Default

    hj,

    Thanks for the feedback. How does this look? Here is the setup with some changes:

    - Coupling is now American Valve No Hub Coupling 1 1/2", part no. RNH40. I took out the Fernco Plumb Quick P1056-150. The Fernco label indicates it is for use with copper, steel, lead and plastic.
    - Trap is now a solvent weld; no union nut, except at the tailpiece.
    - Still have the 1/16th street bend and short nipple into the No Hub.

    I don't understand the point about a "short radius trap". All the PVC 1 1/2" traps I looked at at HD and Lowe's had the same radius on both the bottom u-turn and the outlet ell.

    Thanks.
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    Last edited by chassis; 02-10-2007 at 06:33 PM.

  11. #11
    Plumber Cass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,992

    Default

    Now your cookin with gas!!!!!

  12. #12
    Moderator & Master Plumber hj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Cave Creek, Arizona
    Posts
    23,523

    Default drain

    The problem with the Fernco was not the size, it was its material and design. If it were being used outdoors AND underground it would have been okay. Indoors, whether above ground or below, it cannot be used. If that is truly a "NoHub" coupling then it is also improper because it is made for cast iron on both sides. You need a transition sized for PVC on one side and copper on the other. That is a short radius trap because it has the union joint and is intended for use under a kitchen sink, not under a tub. You should be using the one with a glued joint between the two pieces.

  13. #13
    Engineer chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Thanks for the feedback guys. hj, do you have a recommended manufacturer for a transition coupling? HD and Lowe's don't carry anything besides the improper Fernco in the earlier picture. I have a couple good plumbing supply houses nearby, but want to know what I am asking for.

    The flexible coupling I used is American Valve RNH-40. It's made from neoprene if that matters.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •