Sizing new Boiler properly (methodology) - mid atlantic Maryland

Users who are viewing this thread

bps

New Member
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
DC Area
My house is a 55 year old brick house (approx 3000 sq including finished basement) located in the DC area heated by a hydronic system fed by a 50 year old cast iron boiler (as I child I witnessed it being put in) rated at 300,000 input (240,000 output) btu. The system has 3 heating zones (basement and 2nd floor copper pipe with fins, and 1rst floor cast iron baseboard, each driven by it's own pump) and includes DHW heating coil immersed in the boiler. The 2nd floor is an addition (circa 1960) and is fairly well insulated and the basement is about 50% below ground. All the windows have been upgraded (Anderson)

I'm trying to figure out how to size a new hi-efficiency boiler properly. The one estimate I got on a pro-install was based on them sizing the new boiler based on the old one which from what I can see in this forum seems to be overkill. I've seen people talk about different methods and calculations to do. Can someone point me to an article(s) on what the proper process is?

Also with going with a new boiler, does it make sense to use the boiler for DHW here in the mid-Atlantic area?
 

Dana

In the trades
Messages
7,889
Reaction score
509
Points
113
Location
01609
There are multiple threads on this site showing different approaches to take on it. Most sophisticated heat load tools use ACCA Manual-J, which is basically a refinement of older I=B=R methods, which is also a reasonable starting point.

Bu since you have a fuel-use history on this place, it's possible to put a stake in the ground for an upper bound using the old boiler as the measuring instrument. The boiler's nameplate input & output BTUs, a mid-winter fuel bill with exact billing dates, and a zip code (to look up weather data) is enough information to get started. I'll explain how that's done on a separate response if you can dig up that information.

The classic I=B=R method using the building assembly details works too. "Well insulated" does not have a definition that anybody can work from- wall type, siding type, and insulation type & thicknesses are needed to take as stab at it. Window type (and any storm windows), or the labeled U-factors if you have them are also critical. From the construction type one can estimate a U-factor for the wall area, window area, and roof/attic area. A U-factor is a linear approximation of the heat transfer per square foot of area of each of these elements per degree difference. eg: Your inside design temp is 70F, the 99% outdoor design temp for D.C. is +17F, so the temperature difference is 70-17= 53F.

Assuming the addition has 6 double hung windows that are 10 square feet each you have 60 square feet of window. If the manufacturer labeled it U0.43, the heat load of those windows is 60' x 53F x 0.43= 1367 BTU/hr.

Say the addition was 2x6 framed with R19 batts, wood siding. R=1/U, thus U=1/R, but the thermal bridging of the studs reduces the average R to something like R13 after thermal bridging of all the studs/plates/headers etc., (I can give multiple sources on that, if you like- best you're going to do is R14 average unless you use advanced framing techniques.) That yield a U-factor for the walls of 1/R13= 0.077. Say you have 160' of running wall 10' high for 1600 square feet of wall, less 60' of windows, is 1540' of U0.077 wall. The heat load of the walls are then 1540' x 53F x 0.077= 6285 BTU/hr.

Then, say it's a truss roof with 12" of blown cellulose. The cellulose itself is about R42, but cut that by 10% or so for the thermal bridging of the truss elements, call it R38 (which would be current code min), or a U-factor of 1/38= 0.026 If the attic area is 1000 square feet, the heat load of the attic is 1000' x 53F x 0.026 = 1378 BTU/hr

etc etc etc

Then throw in a WAG for the natural infiltration rates, call it 10 cubic feet per minute. That's 600 cubic feet per hour. The specific heat of a cubic foot of air is about 0.18 BTU per degree F, so the heat load from infiltration is 600 x 53F x 0.18= 5724 BTU/hr

Add it all up. That's something of an upper bound for the true heat load.

Then start subtracting for hot bodies & 24/7 plug loads. Every sleeping human is worth 250BTU/hr, a refrigerator is another 200 BTU/hr. A Tivo is about 300BTU/hr. it goes on.

Brick walls perform differently base on the actual wall construction, so let's have it- what type of brick or block, solid vs. hollow core, how big, and is there a vent cavity between inner & outer wythes, etc. Most block walls are good for at least R1.5 (U0.67) some are good for R3 (U-0.33) and it'll make a real difference in the final number.

Poured concrete basement walls are about U1, but only count the area down to about a foot below grade, ignore the rest.

Single pane windows estimate at U1 With tight fitting storm windows that drops to U0.5. Cheap 1970s-80s vintage double panes are maybe U0.6 or 0.7. Better 1980s double-panes with a low-E coating estimate at U0.40

Typical 2x4 fiberglass insulated walls estimate at U0.01 for rough sizing. (With siding type and actual insulation-R that can be refined a bit.) Typical 2x6 walls figure U0.077.

Solid core 2" doors run about U0.5, six panel wood doors are around U0.8. (Insulated steel and fiber glass doors you can look up by model- they vary quite a bit.)

Build yourself spreadsheet on a room by room heat loss listing all exterior wall/ceiling components components seperately, and sum them up both by room, and the whole house.

Somewhere near the bottom line you'll discover that as long as there's glass in the windows and doors that close there's NO WAY you'd ever need a 300KBTU/hr boiler, or even a 100K boiler in a house that size in that climate.

If you're buying a gas-fire modulating condensing boiler heating hot water with an indirect-fired tank off the boiler is absolutely the right way to go. If you're going with decent efficiency gas-fired cast iron boiler that makes sense too. If oil or propane are your only fuel options, you'll be better off with a heat-pump electric water heater (which will also help dehumidify the basement) or even a plain-old 0.90EF electric tank. There's no way that an embedded coil like you currently have will ever make sense, especially with a boiler correctly sized for the space heating load. The off-season efficiency is low, and the capacity will also be low with a much smaller boiler. And yes, you WILL have a much smaller boiler.

Without knowing much more about your house than you've given so far I'd hazard you're under 80KBTU/hr and with reasonable insulation and air sealing upgrades (and low-E storms over any remaining single-panes) you'd come in under 60KBTU/hr, maybe even under 50KBTU/hr.

Once you have a handle on the heat load, tell us how much radiation (and type) there is, by zone (it matters, from a system design point of view.)
 

Dana

In the trades
Messages
7,889
Reaction score
509
Points
113
Location
01609
Here's a blog article explaining a little bit more about heat load calculations are executed.

If you want to use 1950s-style U-factors on different types of wall assemblies, there is a pretty good listing of different brick-wall U-factors in table 1 section 3 of the classic I=B=R manual. Better insulation and better air-tightness yields somewhat different U-factors than those listed for timber-framed construction, and the actual vs. theoretical framing-fraction can skew that by quite a bit too. I would ignore the infiltration factor tables, since those can (and should be) much reduced by retrofit air sealing.

The window U-factors listed in section 19 are about right for wood-sash windows, a bit optimistic for aluminum-sash, but it's the right range. Extreme accuracy isn't important for ball-parking the boiler size, but resist the urge to round up- 10% here, 10% there on the estimate, then another 20% "just to be sure" at the end will reliably oversize the boiler. Stick to the U-factors listed (or U-factors calculated/derived from more current sources.)
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks