(206) 949-5683, Top Rated Plumber, Seattle
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: American Standard Fairfield: Any opinions or experiences?

  1. #1
    DIY Junior Member Nina in Florida's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012

    Default American Standard Fairfield: Any opinions or experiences?

    I can't talk my husband into buying the Toto Ultimate MS854114-01 . He found a different one piece elongated for less money and keeps asking me what's wrong with it? I can't find any reviews of it . The difference in price between this American Standard Fairfield 2862.056.020 that he likes the price of and the Toto Ultimate is $125. The Toto Ultimate is $377 and the American Standard Fairfield is $248. Both are one piece elongated toilets incl a soft close seat. All I can find about the flush is that the Fairfield has a siphon action bowl, a high volume 3" flush valve and a pilot fill valve vs the Power Gravity of the Toto. Both are 1.6 gal.
    Last edited by Terry; 02-16-2014 at 06:07 PM. Reason: Removed competitors names

  2. #2
    Forum Admin, Expert Plumber Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Bothell, Washington
    Blog Entries


    It's about product quality. Right now TOTO has less then 1% returns. The plumbers love that.

    They both have 3" flush valves.
    I also like the trapway on the TOTO, and that the manufacture using dryer clay, which produces a more consistent product every time.

  3. #3
    Retired Defense Industry Engineer jadnashua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    New England


    AS has had some spotty QA/QC. Buying porcelain that has to be shipped verses picking up locally is risky by itself, especially with a one-piece which is heavier and bulkier than a two piece (which comes in at least two boxes). Big, heavy, awkward is not treated well with most shippers, regardless of the make. Some places do repackage them to prevent most damage.

    FWIW, the Toto will probably be made in the USA, the AS probably in Mexico or elsewhere, but there are exceptions for both companies as world demands dicate.

    Toilets used to be pretty much a commodity - you could get decent performance with most any one. Since they started mandating low-flow, all that became a crapshoot...some companies make reliable, well-made, well-designed items...some have let their QA/QC slip, and even perfect QA/QC may not overcome a poor design (not saying this one has that).

    For something you're likely to use daily and live with for decades, is it worth trying to save a little money? The difference spread out is peanuts.
    Jim DeBruycker
    Important note - I'm not a pro
    Retired Defense Industry Engineer; Schluter 2.5-day Workshop Completed 2013, 2014

  4. #4
    DIY Senior Member wjcandee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    New York, NY


    A couple of things. The Fairfield is actually going to come from one of its marketplace partners (who I am unfamiliar with, and thus unfamiliar with their packaging) and it's going to cost you $50 to ship, There goes $50 of the price difference. The Ultimate has the Power Gravity flush, which works quite well. (The UltraMax, which costs more, has the G-Max flush, which arguably is a little more powerful, but the fact is that the Ultimate is a little quieter and was among the best-performing toilets anywhere when it came out, and still holds its own against virtually all competitors.)

    The guys have summarized the benefits of buying the Toto: great flush, great-looking, made from better clay, excellent quality control, excellent quality, built to last, simple to fix, parts available everywhere.

    Particularly if you are buying online, you don't want to buy something that may be defective, because of the hassle of returning it. There are some inherent risks in getting something shipped to you, you don't want to add to this risk the not-insignificant risk that the AS product sent to you will be defective -- and sometimes shockingly-so, like was the quality-control guy on siesta when the thing came down the line? -- wholly apart from any damage in shipping.)

    I have seen too many ridiculously-defective AS products posted on here to have any confidence in them, whether buying them online or at a big box store (from where we have seen defective AS toilet after defective AS toilet).

    Oh, yeah. The Toto soft-close seat -- the SS114 -- is the same one used on its top of the line toilets. It's a seat that people who don't have Totos buy because they like it so much. You're not going to be able to say the same thing about the seat that comes on the AS.

    One more thing. Both toilets have 3" flush valves, to get more water moving into the flush faster. However, the Toto has a 2-1/8" fully-glazed trapway, which actually makes a difference over the trapway in the Fairfield in terms of reduced clogging. Moreover, in looking at the sketch of the Fairfield trapway, it doesn't look to me as if it has a double-siphon design, nor that it's entirely-sensible based on the criteria that I have seen Terry articulate as to what makes a good trapway. The double-siphon was something first initiated by Toto in the Power Gravity toilets, and explained by an engineer in another post on this board. The double-siphon allows the trapway to forcefully-yet-quietly "pull" the water and waste from the toilet bowl. You'll see that when you hit the flush lever, the thing basically just goes "slurp" as it pulls the waste from the bowl, then goes "gurgle, gurgle, gurgle", then it's done. The first time I used a Toto Ultimate, in Le Pavillon Hotel in New Orleans, I was amazed; it almost seemed as if a trap door opened and the waste quietly fell out. "That's IT?" I thought. How weird. I ended up flushing the thing about 20 times that trip. It almost seemed as if it shouldn't work because instead of the draining-swimming-pools I was used to, with all the attendant swirling and drama, this thing just quietly went "Slurp." And that's entirely-due to the trapway design. There's actually more drama in the G-Max flush than in the one on the Ultimate, which continues to impress me.

    As to things like the fill valve, the AS appears to be using a Fluidmaster 400A fill valve and the Toto will likely use a Korky 528 fill valve. The Korky is quieter and easier to fix down the line, but both valves do the job. I myself now have 6 of 7 toilets with the Korky fill valve, either because they came with it from Toto or because when I rehabbed the toilet, I installed the proper 528 (it comes in a few flavors, based on age and design of toilet). But both do the job, so that isn't a factor in your decision. On the flush valve, the Toto is going to use a Korky "Fits Toto" Power Gravity flapper, which you can get almost anywhere or replace with a universal Korky 3" flapper when the time comes. The AS appears to have a fluidmaster flapper, which a lot of folks on here hate, but it shouldn't be a big deal to find a replacement (although maybe not as easy as the Korky). Again, probably not a deciding factor.
    Last edited by Terry; 02-16-2014 at 06:09 PM.

  5. #5
    In the Trades Gary Swart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Yakima WA


    If you will go to the Toilet Forum and then scroll down to the reviews on American Standard Champion toilets, you will find page after page of mostly negative comments about AS. Now I realize this is not the model you are looking at, but the fact that the biggest seller in the AS line has literally hundreds of negative reviews should send a message. Yes, AS was once a highly respected brand that produced quality toilets, but with the advent of the low flow era, they chose to try tweaking there old design, outsourcing, and through it all lost their quality. Toto engineered the internal design of their toilets and came out with quality products that really work.

Similar Threads

  1. Old Toilet "Standard" same as American Standard? Parts?
    By molo in forum Toilet Forum discussions
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-29-2012, 08:12 PM
  2. tile redi shower pans Current comments/opinions/ experiences
    By skychief in forum Shower & bathtub Forum & Blog
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-03-2011, 08:28 AM
  3. Opinions (good/bad) on Laurel Mountain or American Standard Air Tubs
    By akmacs in forum Shower & bathtub Forum & Blog
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-14-2010, 11:54 AM
  4. standard vs constant pressure pump opinions please
    By madfire in forum Pumps and Tanks Well Forum & Blog
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 07-15-2009, 05:43 AM
  5. Opinions on American Standard
    By TonyBagadonutz in forum Plumbing Forum, Professional & DIY Advice, Tips & Tricks
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-27-2005, 04:02 AM

Tags for this Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts