(206) 949-5683, Top Rated Plumber, Seattle
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: New RO, Reverse osmosis

  1. #1

    Default New RO, Reverse osmosis

    http://next-ro.com/index.php?c=Deale...sinessBenefits

    This is a very nice "little unit" that really puts out the water. Compared to anything out there that I have seen, it produces more water and delivers it faster. What I really like about it stat it is installed in a very short time and takes up very little space and provides a full 1.5 gallons at full pressure. Because it is a WOW tank its waste is minimum and production is very fast.

  2. #2
    DIY Senior Member Chad Schloss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    327

    Default

    what pushes the water out to the ro tap if it does not use air pressure in the tank?

  3. #3
    DIYer, not in the trades LLigetfa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    NW Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    3,678

    Default

    A WOW tank has water on both sides of the bladder. Water pressure on one side pushes out the RO water out from the other side.

  4. #4

    Default

    Most RO tanks have two chambers. One with product water taking up 30% of the tank. The other is air charged with around 7-9psi. As water goes the faucet, it loses pressure until the water just dribbles out.

    With a WOW tank, your source water pressure drive to water. This can mean your water is being pushed by 40-60 psi and continues until the tank is empty without diminishing.

    There are many other great benefits with this RO.

  5. #5
    Water systems designer, R&D ditttohead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,707
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The Next-Ro is a spectacular design but it has struggled to gain traction yet. I beleive that with the right marketing, this can be a huge hit in our industry. Most water treatement dealers who have been around a long time are familiar with the WOW design from previous manufacturers. The older designs were innovative, but they were ahead of their time and the complexity of the systems were their failure. The Next-RO has removed the majority of the problems associated with a WOW design. Still, for the water treatment industry, a standard (traditional) RO works well in the majority of applications, the simple addition of a Permeate Pump increases the efficiency tremendously for very little additional cost. I am a huge fan of the Next-Ro, I just dont see our industry embracing it for a while. It has been around for many years now, and the interest has been low. This is too bad, because a WOW design makes sense.

  6. #6

    Default

    I agree with the premise of WOW design. It is how membrane technology first started to be. That and continuous waste to the drain, which kept the membrane fresh. But water storage/space needs and waste control began to restrict ROs full potential. The WOW eliminates a few of those problems and we will see these become standard in the coming years...a lot manual shifts were once called 'standard' transmissions so will go the air-charged tank.

  7. #7
    Water systems designer, R&D ditttohead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,707
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    well.... The air charged tank has been on its death bed for over 20 years when WOW and direct flow first came out and now with the modified EDI systems. But.... the WOW and direct flow are still niche products. We manufacture a lot of direct flow designs, and price still rules when it comes to system design. Adding the proper controls and devices required to make direct flow work properly raises the price and complexity too high to make it a viable product, so most of ours go out with all of the known flaws that are inherent in the design. WOW has similar design limitations, and considering the extremely simple, and very low cost of a "traditional" R.O., I still dont see the design showing any sings of slowing down. There are a couple of direct flow RO manufacturers out there, we have tested them extensively. The design is great, but the complexity and certain design limitations will have to be overcome as will the price limitations.
    BTW, I am not a fan of the air charged tanks, I sell hundreds of thousands a year, and they are basically a loss leader for us. They take up too much floor space, and we make extremely low margins on them. Next-Ro has really pushed the quality and design forward for the WOW market, I just hope they find a good market for that product. It has more potential than any other WOW design I have seen.

  8. #8

    Default

    What other WOW systems have you known? There's a Russian one, I know of and another American one, too.

  9. #9
    Water systems designer, R&D ditttohead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,707
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Back in the day, when I was just starting my career in the water treatment industry, I had the pleasure of working for a company that sold a lot of HP-6 units. The HydroPure WOW design with the faucet that looked like a leafless tree under the counter. The majority of the control were on the faucet instead of in the RO head. This system also had encapsulated GAC filters that were not serviceable, I guess you were supposed to throw the whole system away every time the GAC filter needed to be replaced. These were one of the first WOW RO systems to be mass marketed. They were quickly replaced by the Hydrotech RO. The design was very unique, but the complexity doomed it from the start.

  10. #10

    Default

    I tried to find some info on the older unit but couldn't. I would be interested in reading about it. Thanks, Dittohead.

  11. #11
    Water systems designer, R&D ditttohead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,707
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I have collected manuals for 20 years on water treatment systems, unfortunately, that is one I am missing. From what I remember, there was a lot of contreversy due to patent issues so the system had even more limitations to keep it legal. It worked great some of the time, but we quickly switched over to the the standard HT-4 by Hydrotech to get away from all of the problems. I had one in my moms house for a short amount of time, I remember I was very anxious to get rid of it and put in the HT-4, I was about as impressed with that unit as I was the old Fleck CTA RO with built in water heater (used to increase flow rate, and electrical usage!). Now we manufacture our own proprietary RO which is marketed under several names, and we have been doing a lot of direct flow units overseas. The direct flow has proven to be a pain in too many ways to describe. We have fond a great way to make the direct flow systems work, ... we add a tank to them. Al of our direct flow units now come with optional tank hook ups.

  12. #12

    Default

    When you say 'direct flow' RO, are you including the Merlin? I had always thought that would be a great RO for some applications and I know a company that was using it for a while but quit due to service callbacks. I thought they were using them in the wrong application but did like the idea.

    I am still looking for that previous WOW system you had mentioned. Do you have any links? PM me if you need.

  13. #13
    Water systems designer, R&D ditttohead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,707
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The merlin is one example of a direct flow design. There are a multitude of problems with direct flow designs, we have designed out a few of them. All of them could be designed out but the complexity of the system and the cost increase makes them difficult to market compared to a traditional RO.

    We even do a Proprietary (sanitary quick change) direct flow ro system, but we have not released it in the US market, only overseas. The US market is much more demanding on system performance than other markets, and the majority of households have ice makers, refrigerated water, etc, that the direct flow systms tend to have difficult with. The Merlin can be a great RO, and you are absolutely right, it needs to be used in the right application to perform. The merlin has been re-released, and they have improved on the original design considerably.

    The HP-6, I have no literature on, but I have a friend who was an assembler of them at the factory in California 20+ years ago, I will email him and see if he still has any literature on it.

  14. #14
    DIY Junior Member Well-man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic Region
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ditttohead View Post
    The Next-Ro is a spectacular design but it has struggled to gain traction yet. I beleive that with the right marketing, this can be a huge hit in our industry. Most water treatement dealers who have been around a long time are familiar with the WOW design from previous manufacturers. The older designs were innovative, but they were ahead of their time and the complexity of the systems were their failure. The Next-RO has removed the majority of the problems associated with a WOW design. Still, for the water treatment industry, a standard (traditional) RO works well in the majority of applications, the simple addition of a Permeate Pump increases the efficiency tremendously for very little additional cost. I am a huge fan of the Next-Ro, I just dont see our industry embracing it for a while. It has been around for many years now, and the interest has been low. This is too bad, because a WOW design makes sense.
    The NEXT-RO looks advantageous. Why has interest in NEXT-RO been low? Marketing? Cost compared to a standard RO + Permeate Pump? Are there any issues with the design that have not yet been addressed?

    Thanks.

  15. #15
    DIY Senior Member mialynette2003's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Ocala, Florida
    Posts
    663

    Default

    Just from the looks of it, I see problems with it fitting under all sinks.

Similar Threads

  1. reverse osmosis system
    By wallskev in forum Plumbing Forum, Professional & DIY Advice, Tips & Tricks
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-04-2010, 03:30 PM
  2. RO filter ( reverse osmosis ) ?
    By tommy vercetti in forum Plumbing Forum, Professional & DIY Advice, Tips & Tricks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-15-2009, 06:21 PM
  3. Reverse Osmosis Distance
    By peterd in forum Plumbing Forum, Professional & DIY Advice, Tips & Tricks
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-12-2008, 12:43 PM
  4. Help with reverse osmosis sytem
    By Girevik in forum Plumbing Forum, Professional & DIY Advice, Tips & Tricks
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-24-2007, 07:59 AM
  5. Reverse Osmosis or not
    By Kai in forum Plumbing Forum, Professional & DIY Advice, Tips & Tricks
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-24-2005, 09:58 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •