Reply With QuoteSo I am one of the 71 grateful men that got raped by a few cousins and one fine teacher, although by that time I suppose I was past the age of consent.
Homosexual men raping heterosexual men is already quite covered by laws.
|
|
|
Gov't expands count of rape victims by adding men
http://news.yahoo.com/govt-expands-c...175516627.html
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government is expanding its definition of rape, including men for the first time when counting the number of victims, the Obama administration announced Friday.
The expansion, which supporters say is long overdue, is important because policymakers and lawmakers use crime statistics to allocate resources for prevention and victim assistance.
In a press briefing, senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett called the change a "very, very important step" because it counts men and because it includes rapes of women other than by physical force.
Since 1929, the FBI has defined rape as the carnal knowledge of a female, forcibly and against her will. The revised definition covers any gender of victim or attacker and includes instances in which the victim is incapable of giving consent due to the influence of drugs or alcohol or because of age. Physical resistance is not required.
The new definition will not change federal or state laws and will not alter charges or prosecutions.
"Rape is a devastating crime, and we can't solve it unless we know the full extent of it," Vice President Joe Biden said in a statement.
Biden, author of the Violence Against Women Act when he was in the Senate, said the new definition is a victory for women and men "whose suffering has gone unaccounted for over 80 years."
According to government data, one in five women and one in 71 men are rape victims.
So I am one of the 71 grateful men that got raped by a few cousins and one fine teacher, although by that time I suppose I was past the age of consent.
Homosexual men raping heterosexual men is already quite covered by laws.
I only copied what was written 20 minutes ago in the news.
You might know this, but, rape is not about sex. It is about control and power over someone else.
I agree with Joe Biden.
Rape needs to redefined.
You can not rape the willing...
Don't pay someone to do a job fast, when you can do a half-fast job yourself.
I think the book of rape incentives would run to few thousand pages..... and sometimes it really is just some poor bastard out of jail that needs a female under him without the money to pay for it. As I said before, prostitution MUST be legal, and vouchers given to the poor just like food stamps. Then maybe my kid can walk to school again.Originally Posted by Cookie
Think of all those sluts out there actually using their talent and making money and saving normal girls from trauma.
I'm with Ballvalve on this one, especially when the abuse of children is involved. The RCs, Oblates, and others who serially abused children were/are inherently evil and motivated by the same and by their twisted belief in what sex is. And the bishops who covered up for them were/are worse.
And the priests and Bishops and coaches should get special discounts at the house of happiness. Magic! 98% less kids groped in the shower and confessional. Probably could eliminate sales tax in all states.
Casinos are a bigger problem. CAUSES addiction, where as we all come pre-addicted to sex.
I don't think that the priests and bishops would take advantage of the discounts, unless the h of h's employees were under 12. That's the problem with being inherently evil-short of throwing away the key there's not much that can (or should) be done.
Special pay for 18 year olds with those baby faces and braided hair [or a crew cut] in catholic school outfits. OOps! there goes all the money from the church collection basket!
Any Religion that expects you to "Do Without" a normal bodily function, May not be all that good.
I would change Religions, Instead of harming others.
Just my thought.
Don't pay someone to do a job fast, when you can do a half-fast job yourself.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks