Stringing together multiple extension cords

Users who are viewing this thread

Teve

Member
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
Minnesota
Are there any electrical issues with stringing together multiple outdoor extension cords, (for a 12 Amp leaf blower), as long as they are all at least 12 Amp cords?
 

hj

Master Plumber
Messages
33,603
Reaction score
1,042
Points
113
Location
Cave Creek, Arizona
Website
www.terrylove.com
Multiple short ones are the same a single long one, but unless you get ridiculous on the number of ones connected together and their connections are ALL tight, there is no prohibition.
 

LLigetfa

DIYer, not in the trades
Messages
7,503
Reaction score
577
Points
113
Location
NW Ontario, Canada
If they are the cheap injection molded ends, expect them to be high resistance and heat up. Most every extension cord I have has had at least the female end replaced with a higher quality end.
 

Cacher_Chick

Test, Don't Guess!
Messages
5,458
Reaction score
213
Points
63
Location
Land of Cheese
How much is too much depends on the quality of the cords and their connections.
If the voltage drop from the length of the cord becomes too great it will damage the motor. If the connections are not very good, the plugs will overheat and burn.
How much is too much depends on the quality of the cords and their connections.

If this is something you will be using on a regular basis, it would be much better to have a branch circuit with outlets installed out on the property so you don't have to use great lengths of cord.
 

Teve

Member
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
Minnesota
Thanks for the replies. (One more question below.)

I have 50' and 80' 15 amp cords (and another 50' 13 amp cord I probably would not need to use), mainly for a 12 amp leaf blower/vac on a smaller size yard with one tree. I want to cover the front and back yard using one outlet. It sounds like I should have no problem. It seems I just need to make sure the plugs don't get warm and I assume 180' with three cords is far from being ridiculous.

My leaf blower has variable speed which I am guessing is controlled by the voltage applied to the motor. If there were a significant voltage drop due to excessive length or high resistance connections would that still be an issue for the motor?
 

Cacher_Chick

Test, Don't Guess!
Messages
5,458
Reaction score
213
Points
63
Location
Land of Cheese
IMO, trying to do anything with 180 feet of extension cord is ridiculous.

Save yourself a lot of trouble and get a gas powered blower.
 

Teve

Member
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
Minnesota
I would very likely not ever use 180 feet for anything. It was more of a hypothetical comment and question. I'll probably just stick to using the 80' cord only. For my size lawn and only one tree, and a couple bushes at the edge of the yard, the electric blower seems to work out very well.
 

Ballvalve

General Engineering Contractor
Messages
3,581
Reaction score
45
Points
48
Location
northfork, california
Seems to me if its a brush motor, and likely is, more cords will just give him a hair dryer.

I have had many an argument with electricians wiring to submersible pump motors made by Franklin. Franklin actually designs its motors to start on reduced voltage and encourages it because it reduces stress on the impeller shaft. Mimics a soft start unit of great expense.

Take a look at Franklins wiring chart and how economical it is vs. the NEC. Point being: the link wire chart does not apply to certain motors and installations.

http://www.franklin-electric.com/aim-manual/page-11.aspx
 
Last edited:

JWelectric

Electrical Contractor/Instructor
Messages
2,608
Reaction score
21
Points
38
Location
North Carolina
have had many an argument with electricians wiring to submersible pump motors made by Franklin. Take a look at Franklins wiring chart and how economical it is vs. the NEC.

The point being; if it doesn't meet the NEC then it won't pass inspection no matter what Franklin publishes
 

Ballvalve

General Engineering Contractor
Messages
3,581
Reaction score
45
Points
48
Location
northfork, california
That means about 10 million wells in the USA need the wire changed. Ask any well driller. And Inspectors dont get involved with whats going down a well 99.99% of the time.

The manufacturer deems the installation safe for the specialized motor and its a rare inspector that does not defer to the Mfgr's specs.

Maybe the NEC bible needs an update for well motors. Save the poor consumers billions in useless copper.
 

JWelectric

Electrical Contractor/Instructor
Messages
2,608
Reaction score
21
Points
38
Location
North Carolina
Here in good old North Carolina a well driller cannot install the wires to the pump unless he holds an electrical license. The electrical inspector will always look at the conductors that exit the well cap for the size of the conductor.

Any manufacture can mandate conductors larger than that called for by the NEC but no manufacturer can ask for anything to be installed smaller than what is mandated by the NEC.

90.1 (B) Adequacy. This Code contains provisions that are considered necessary for safety. Compliance therewith and proper maintenance results in an installation that is essentially free from hazard but not necessarily efficient, convenient, or adequate for good service or future expansion of electrical use.
As one can see the code is a bare minimum safety standard and anything less is not safe.
 

Ballvalve

General Engineering Contractor
Messages
3,581
Reaction score
45
Points
48
Location
northfork, california
That must be why so many of us moved to California.

And when you have a dedicated line to a motor designed to SAFELY run on, say 600' of #10 cable and the NEC wants # 6 or 4, you have a serious malfunction between entities. And I bet it means a lot of people neglect to call for a permit. And its a sad waste of a precious commodity that a lot of people cannot afford in our depression.

Starting a 3" submersible pump motor has no relationship to a split phase basic utility motor. Perhaps the NEC should address that.

Sort of like the 100 year old barns in the area with 2x4 rafters that now require 2x12's. I know asking you to question authority is a real uphill run, but much of it has run amok.
 

JWelectric

Electrical Contractor/Instructor
Messages
2,608
Reaction score
21
Points
38
Location
North Carolina
That must be why so many of us moved to California.

And when you have a dedicated line to a motor designed to SAFELY run on, say 600' of #10 cable and the NEC wants # 6 or 4, you have a serious malfunction between entities. And I bet it means a lot of people neglect to call for a permit. And its a sad waste of a precious commodity that a lot of people cannot afford in our depression.

Starting a 3" submersible pump motor has no relationship to a split phase basic utility motor. Perhaps the NEC should address that.

Sort of like the 100 year old barns in the area with 2x4 rafters that now require 2x12's. I know asking you to question authority is a real uphill run, but much of it has run amok.

As you pointed out the pump can safely operate on 600 feet of #10 then why would the NEC not allow it?

Around my area we are talking about 3 to 4 hundred feet from house to pump and in most cases it will be #12.
 

Ballvalve

General Engineering Contractor
Messages
3,581
Reaction score
45
Points
48
Location
northfork, california
As you pointed out the pump can safely operate on 600 feet of #10 then why would the NEC not allow it?

Excellent question for you. I get enough loaded questions from my employees. Ostrich effect? No chapter for dedicated lines to submersible pumps? Not interested in specially wound dedicated purpose motors? Copper lobby bought the NEC boss a golf trip to Bermuda?

We cannot say that its an issue of the next guy coming in and putting in a split phase motor, or a 3 HP motor, because a man with a 3500 watt wall heater and a NEC approved wire run to it can just as easily come in and install a 5500w or greater replacement heater. In all cases an ELECTRICIAN or preferably for the well, a pump man would re-evaluate the wiring for the new load.

The smallest paragraph in the NEC bible referring installers to the pump motor MFGRS. specs might save millions of tons of copper a year. Seems a worthy cause.

Around my area we are talking about 3 to 4 hundred feet from house to pump and in most cases it will be #12.

Recently caught a guy in the pump forum with the same situation that forgot to add in the 400 feet down the hole. Got a nice thank you from him.
 
Last edited:

JWelectric

Electrical Contractor/Instructor
Messages
2,608
Reaction score
21
Points
38
Location
North Carolina
Recently caught a guy in the pump forum with the same situation that forgot to add in the 400 feet down the hole. Got a nice thank you from him.

As the electrician installing the conductors I include the distance from the point of overcurrent to the electrical motor that turns the pump. What did you think I was addressing, from the house to the well head?

If the pump has the minimum circuit ampacity and the maximum overcurrent marked on the name plate this is what gets installed. If the pump is simply marked with its horse power then I go to Table 430.248 and do the math.

What is left to discuss?
 

Ballvalve

General Engineering Contractor
Messages
3,581
Reaction score
45
Points
48
Location
northfork, california
If you have a above ground jet pump, then you are correct. If you have a 3" Franklin wound, special purpose motor, you should, out of decency to your clients and the earth, use their carefully designed wire chart.

As to house to well head, if you have a 3 wire pump, one can use the NEC to get there, and then use the chart for Frankklins 3 wire pumps to go down the well. These may be several sizes smaller. One line is used for starting and running cap.

Its a whole different ballgame, and I think the NEC deserves to give your students more information.
 

BobL43

DIY Senior Member
Messages
1,802
Reaction score
8
Points
38
Location
Long Island, NY
If you have a above ground jet pump, then you are correct. If you have a 3" Franklin wound, special purpose motor, you should, out of decency to your clients and the earth, use their carefully designed wire chart.

As to house to well head, if you have a 3 wire pump, one can use the NEC to get there, and then use the chart for Frankklins 3 wire pumps to go down the well. These may be several sizes smaller. One line is used for starting and running cap.

Its a whole different ballgame, and I think the NEC deserves to give your students more information.
and the winner is: nobody. does there have to be a winner with everything?
 

Ballvalve

General Engineering Contractor
Messages
3,581
Reaction score
45
Points
48
Location
northfork, california
The loser is the homeowner that gave up a trip to Hawaii in copper cost because of a system that does not fully address reality.
 

JWelectric

Electrical Contractor/Instructor
Messages
2,608
Reaction score
21
Points
38
Location
North Carolina
If you have a above ground jet pump, then you are correct. If you have a 3" Franklin wound, special purpose motor, you should, out of decency to your clients and the earth, use their carefully designed wire chart.
I see nothing wrong with this suggestion as long as the carefully designed wire chart does not conflict with the NEC

As to house to well head, if you have a 3 wire pump, one can use the NEC to get there, and then use the chart for Frankklins 3 wire pumps to go down the well. These may be several sizes smaller. One line is used for starting and running cap.
From the panel to the motor that turns the pump is a series circuit. In a series circuit the current is the same throughout the circuit.
So how does the Franklin pump wiring chart account for this? Has Franklin somehow figured out how to divide current in a series circuit?

Its a whole different ballgame, and I think the NEC deserves to give your students more information.
No, The laws of current flow does not change due to Franklin pumps.

Side note
I received this in an email this morning and posted it here. The above was sent to me by a student and I agree with the student

Edited to add
What the students and myself do know is the difference in Tables 310.15(B)(16) and (17) and so on in the NEC (2011) edition.
 
Last edited:
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks