Backflow/check valve code

Users who are viewing this thread

benniebeeker

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Chicago, IL
Hello all,

Our building floods in the basement every 2-3 years due to insufficient capacity of the city sewers. Basically, rainwater takes over during really bad storms and it just backs up through our floor drains. We have been struggling to get a backflow/check valve installed but are getting the runaround from a handful of plumbers. Basically, we need someone who is familiar with city rules and regulations to clarify a few things for us.

First a little more information. We had our roof runoff downspouts diverted out into the alley instead of into the catch basin where our other lines run into. This helped significantly when we had our last flood. We only had an inch instead of a foot. Plumbers have been able to locate the pipe at the street. Sadly, it runs underneath a load bearing wall and then follows through underneath one of the units making it almost impossible to install inside the exterior wall. It would mean that we would have to have it installed inside of that unit. We were told that the check valves would need a service port so they can be greased and maintained annually.

One plumber told us that they would need to put the service port and check valve in the unit and claim that no odor/spill would incur. I find this difficult to believe. Another plumber told is that we have no choice but to put it out at the street since it is against building code to put a service port inside of a building. This same plumber told us that most plumbers want to put the valves inside of the building to cut costs. They don't want to chase the permits that are required to do the work in the sidewalk (or pay the fees) and they don't have to dig nearly as deep if they install it as close to the back as possible.

Is anyone familiar with City of Chicago code? Can they confirm that it is indeed against code to have check valves installed within the walls of the building? Assuming that we can go this road, what are the chances that an odor will take over and what are the chances that we get a spill?

Any insight would be greatly appreciated. This project has been ongoing for almost a year now. We haven't had a single consistent answer!!!!
 

SewerRatz

Illinois Licensed Plumber
Messages
1,681
Reaction score
10
Points
38
Location
Chicago, IL
Website
www.a-archer.net
There is nothing against the code to install a back water valve inside the building. The valve is sealed tight so you will not get any odors. It does need to be able to be serviced which is recommended to be done yearly. Just putting in a backwater valve will only solve the trouble of the city sewer backing up into the building. A flood control is a much better solution. Most flood controls are installed outside, which requires a manhole to be installed with the backwater valve, an overflow pipe on the house side of the backwater valve and a ejector pit/pump. When the city sewer backs up the backwater valve is forced closed preventing the city sewer from backing up in the building, but now the building waste water can not flow out anymore so it will leave out of the overflow pipe into the ejector pit, the pump will then pump the buildings waste water out beyond the backwater valve.

Now there is an inside version of a flood control system you can install by Tramco, its called the Tramco 960 http://www.tramcopump.com/ResidentialDetails.cfm?ProdID=26

Here is the only requirements by the City of Chicago for installing a flood control
Flood Controls
Contractors installing flood control systems must submit the following to the Department of Water
Management for approval before a permit can be issued:
1. A copy of the contract, signed by the owner, stating the work to be performed.
2. The horsepower, discharge size and capacity of the pump to be used.
3. A sketch of the lot with dimensions showing the building, existing downspouts and all work
to be performed.
4. Downspouts are required to be disconnected prior to the installation of a flood control
system. The Contractor must inform the homeowner in writing, as part of the contract
whether the pump is sized to carry the roof drainage if disconnection is not feasible.
 

benniebeeker

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Chicago, IL
thank you for the reply... do you know of anyone that would be willing to do the flood control system out in our sidewalk??? We got a quote for 11k for a valve, basin, and ejector pump. Does this seem reasonable????

any recommendations would be greatly appreciated.

regards,

ben
 

benniebeeker

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Chicago, IL
on a side note, most plumbers that we have talked to do NOT want to touch the sidewalk... the way our unit layout / main sewer line work, the only we place we can put it is in the sidewalk... we are NOT going to put one in the unit that it is under... the rest of the pipe is under a load wall...
 

SewerRatz

Illinois Licensed Plumber
Messages
1,681
Reaction score
10
Points
38
Location
Chicago, IL
Website
www.a-archer.net
Now putting a flood control on city property is a different story. In the past I never seen the city allow anyone to put a clean out or a flood control on their property. 11K is not a bad price, it is a big job. They have to dig out a large enough area and haul away all the debris they dig out, put in the pump pit below the grade of the sewer line, install the backwater valve the overflow tee then make a cement base Then they have to install the manhole, some use pre cast basins others will build one with catch basin blocks (we build ours). Then they have to install the pump, run the electricity.

You are best to call the city Sewer department to find out what they will or will not allow. BTW in Chicago you do not want a plumber for this, you need some one with a Sewer and Drain Layer license.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

benniebeeker

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Chicago, IL
interesting that you say that you have never heard of people putting sewer solutions on public property... most plumbers we spoke with have never heard of this either... there are only 2 that i have dealt with which say that it is possible... to install under the sidewalk, we need to pay an annual fee on the amount of square footage we are using... in our case, it is about $450 a year... totally worth it to prevent the flooding we have been having every few years... its a frickin headache...
 

SewerRatz

Illinois Licensed Plumber
Messages
1,681
Reaction score
10
Points
38
Location
Chicago, IL
Website
www.a-archer.net
The Tramco 960 is a very good solution to be installed in the building / home. Then there would be no question about public property, and the cost of the install will be a few thousand cheaper. I have put in the Tramco 960 for 9800.00 and in that case electricity was near by to run the pump.
 

hj

Master Plumber
Messages
33,602
Reaction score
1,038
Points
113
Location
Cave Creek, Arizona
Website
www.terrylove.com
That is a lift station, which operates by gravity as a fallback option. Years ago, in Chicago, there was a company which made a system which was completely in the floor. It was basically a backflow valve with a pump to take over during flooded conditions to pump out any water used in the building, or which seeped through the BFV. Are you old enough to remember them if you ever heard of the company?
 

SewerRatz

Illinois Licensed Plumber
Messages
1,681
Reaction score
10
Points
38
Location
Chicago, IL
Website
www.a-archer.net
Are you talking about the unit that has the floats attached to the flapper in the backwater valve? If so my dad knew the guy that invented that system. I can not recall the name of the company right now, I will talk to my dad in the morning and ask him and post.

There where thredifferentnt systems out here. The one with the two floats attached to the backwater valve, then there was one that had a motor and a fine thread screw, when the city sewer backed up the motor would close the gate valve. That unit was a large metal box, seen mostly in Cicero. Then the system my father installed which is the outside manhole with the backwater valve 2" ejector.
 

SewerRatz

Illinois Licensed Plumber
Messages
1,681
Reaction score
10
Points
38
Location
Chicago, IL
Website
www.a-archer.net
The company was All Power Sewer Service, the owner used to be parnters with Geroge Holmes from Dombrowskie & Holmes. The other system installer around here is EverReady. Them where the two big flood control installers in the Chicago area.
 

John Riley

New Member
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Massachusetts
This is a very interesting thread. I have a duplex up in a three story graystone in Chicago and my neighbors and the co-owner of the building (garden apt.) suffered basement flooding this summer. In response, several of my neighbors have installed backflow preventers. My downstairs neighbor would like us to do the same. Several companies have quoted prices of about $7,000 but one suggested that since the roof drain is connected to our system, to properly install the system they wanted to re-route the roof drainage pipe to drain separately into the sewer at the front of the house - before the back-floor preventer. This would add another $7,000 to the project since they wanted to bury the pipe for the distance of the house. This does make some sense, since flooding only occurs during big rains and the rain water would then back up into the basement if the preventer was engaged. I read elsewhere that basement flooding could be greatly mitigated by disconnecting the drain pipe. Why couldn't we drain the water to the alleyway?? Isd that an option?? I can't imagine spending $14,000!!! Thanks
 

hj

Master Plumber
Messages
33,602
Reaction score
1,038
Points
113
Location
Cave Creek, Arizona
Website
www.terrylove.com
Most stormwater codes specify that the water has to stay on your property. ANYONE who quotes a backwater valve installation MUST also include disconnecting the downspout lines from the sewer. However, a backflow valve, as a practical matter, may NOT prevent a basement flood, it may only slow the process down, after it has been installed for a couple of years.
 

hj

Master Plumber
Messages
33,602
Reaction score
1,038
Points
113
Location
Cave Creek, Arizona
Website
www.terrylove.com
No, this was a complete unit with a backwater valve, and one or two pumps in a chamber above the pipe. The backwater valve would close during a backflood condition. When water was used in the house it would rise into the chamber and the pump(s) would discharge it downstream from the check valve. It solved all the problems inherent to a backwater valve. I don't remember the name and I think the company was on the near North side.
 

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,796
Reaction score
4,412
Points
113
Location
IL
Most stormwater codes specify that the water has to stay on your property.
I know that is an Arizona thing, and maybe a thing in some other places that I don't know of. I think most other places require that rain water be allowed to flow through where it historically flowed. In those places you are not allowed to dam your yard off to stop water from flowing in from the adjoining property. People some time do, and they sometimes get away with it.

Arizona, on the other hand wants you to collect your rain water until it soaks in or evaporates. So back yards are often designed with a depression to hold that water.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drainage_law does not cover the Arizona method.
ttp://www.justanswer.com/real-estate-law/28d54-neighbor-blocking-stormwater-drain-off.html is similar to the Wikipedia article.

On the OP's situation, Chicago mostly has a combined sanitary and storm sewer system. They have fairly recently put flow restrictors on the street storm water inlets. http://www.cityofchicago.org/city/e...ocking_rainwaterandpreventingsewerbackup.html I am thinking they expect downspout water to ultimately to the street where it will be introduced into the combined sewer with some delay.
 
Last edited:

DrWiremore

New Member
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
North Riverside
The Tramco 960 is a very good solution to be installed in the building / home. Then there would be no question about public property, and the cost of the install will be a few thousand cheaper. I have put in the Tramco 960 for 9800.00 and in that case electricity was near by to run the pump.
I know its been a while - I have a tramco 610 in a Chicago burb, been here since 1963 I believe. It gets regular service and maintenance on the check valves. Unfortunately, the flood side vs the building side is leaking. When I say leaking, it is leaking from the valve service cover which is clamped closed to prevent just this. Basically, if the city side of the flood control leaks, you don't have flood control.

20220430 Tranco 610 city side cover leakage.png
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks