Water Heater Timer? Gas or Electric? Any recommendations?

Users who are viewing this thread

Dana

In the trades
Messages
7,889
Reaction score
509
Points
113
Location
01609
With electric tanks, the timers are essentially useless- the temps don't fall far enough over 8-10 hours to reduce the average heat loss by even a percent or two.

With gas heaters (which are inherently lossier due to the necessary insultion gaps and convection through the center tank heat exchanger) it's maybe a bit more, but "...a worthwhile investment..." probably not, in most cases. (It might be with propane-fired tanks though, due the high cost of the fuel.)

What IS a worthwhile investment is insulating the near-tank plumbing (withing 6' of the tank) to at least R4 with closed-cell foam pipe insulation (including the cold feed an the temperature & pressure outledt plumbing), as well as any accessible hot water distribution plumbing. The cheezy 3/8" wall stuff sold at box stores is better than nothing (~ R2) , but in most instances going with 5/8"-3/4" wall goods (online, or from plumbing supply houses, or Grainger). See:


http://www.leaningpinesoftware.com/hot_water_pipes.shtml


http://www.leaningpinesoftware.com/hot_water_heater_vacation.shtml

http://www.leaningpinesoftware.com/hot_water_pipes_pipe_cooling.shtml

Sometimes the better solution is the lowest-tech.
 

hj

Master Plumber
Messages
33,600
Reaction score
1,037
Points
113
Location
Cave Creek, Arizona
Website
www.terrylove.com
Unless the timer causes the tank to become completely cold and keeps it that way for an extended time, the timer does NOTHING to save gas, because the burner just has to run for a single longer time to reheat the tank instead of operating for short periods several times. IF it lets it get cold, and you don't mind having NO hot water, then it will save gas, because it just has to heat a single tank of water, instead of reheating all the water you used, (which could have been MORE than the 40 or 50 gallons the tank holds), while the timer kept it off. And this applies to both electric and gas models.
 

Ballvalve

General Engineering Contractor
Messages
3,581
Reaction score
45
Points
48
Location
northfork, california
A good place to store all your old jackets is on top of a electric water heater. Long underwear makes great pipe wrap also.
 

Ballvalve

General Engineering Contractor
Messages
3,581
Reaction score
45
Points
48
Location
northfork, california
I can tell you that under my jacket pile, you could likely poach an egg. Those new heaters leak heat, but the case does not feel warm because its constantly being shed to daylight. The T&P is like a heat sink when left exposed to daylight also.
 

jeffreyd

New Member
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
California
Gas Water Heater Timers can be useless in certain applications. For less than $150.00 investment it is certainly a good idea to try one out. You will certainly regain your investment. The amount of time will vary. See www.gaswaterheatertimer.com or waterheatertimer.org for more info.
 

LLigetfa

DIYer, not in the trades
Messages
7,497
Reaction score
575
Points
113
Location
NW Ontario, Canada
Only if there is time-of-use billing, can I see any real benefit. Defer consumption to the off-peak billing rate.
 

jeffreyd

New Member
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
California
Gas Water Heater Timer

Ive been studying up about these timers for gas and electric water heater timers and found a couple websites, but I thought I'd ask the pros if they had any experience with either type. Do they work? How do they work? Is is a worth while investment? :confused:


http://www.gaswaterheatertimer.comhttp://www.gaswaterheatertimer.com

and http://waterheatertimer.org

Timers have been installed on electric water heaters for decades. They do work in most cases. There is a gas water heater timer available. See www.gaswaterheatertimer.com
 

JerryR

Active Member
Messages
584
Reaction score
41
Points
28
Location
Florida
Timers have been installed on electric water heaters for decades. They do work in most cases.........[/url]

Sure they "work", but are they cost effective is the important question.

One study in Florida estimated savings of 21 cents per month.

There is no energy credit that I know of that applies to timers on water heaters. That tells you something.

If you live in a warm climate then heat recovery units on your air conditioner are great. I turned my water heater circuit breaker off 9 months a year and never ran out of hot water. It recovered the heat removed from the home and used it to heat the water in the tank. It also increased the efficiency of the central air by 5%.

Jerry
 
Last edited:

LLigetfa

DIYer, not in the trades
Messages
7,497
Reaction score
575
Points
113
Location
NW Ontario, Canada
One study in Florida estimated savings of 21 cents per month.

And that's in a Southern state where it costs more to cool than it does to heat. In many other parts of the World, the small amount of standby heat loss is not really lost, it is heating the house.
 

hj

Master Plumber
Messages
33,600
Reaction score
1,037
Points
113
Location
Cave Creek, Arizona
Website
www.terrylove.com
Interesting that BradfordWhite would endorse that timer, because it will NOT work with their thermostats. Again, however, if the gas burner turns back on before the tank gets cold, then you saved NOTHING, because the burner will have to reheat the water you used, regardless of whether it is one long burn, or several shorter ones. It is only when the tank goes cold and you continue using the cold water that you save money, because when the burner comes on it only has to heat the water in the tank, NOT all the water you used after the hot water ran out.
 

Dana

In the trades
Messages
7,889
Reaction score
509
Points
113
Location
01609
It's not exactly nothing- the standby losses drop with tank temp even when you're not using the tepid water in the tank. On lossy atmosheric drafted gas HW heaters automatic setback might have some advantage- the temp would drop more than 10F overnight, for a lower average standby loss. The less lossy the water heater, the less you'd get out of a setback strategy.

The only time the savings outlined in that PDF hit 36% was in the very low volume use profile (not surprisingly.) As a percentage of the total fuel use the standby loss dominates when the use volumes are low. But 36% of a tiny number may never have an economic rationale, since the savings are probably less than the 7% savings indicated in the "typical" water use profile. But you'd get more than a 7% savings by simply dropping the storage temp from 130F to 125F to lower the standby loss.
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks