Vacuum Breaker Flush - Household Use

Users who are viewing this thread

Baumgrenze

Member
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
Points
8
Location
California - Mid Left Coast
This is a point of clarification. Is the reason that vacuum breaker flush devices (the kind used in public restrooms) are not used in household bathrooms is that they must be fed via at least a 1" water line and household are normally plumbed with 1/2" copper? Can I safely conclude that the latter size pipe will not deliver enough water for a good flush?

Thanks,

baumgrenze
 
Last edited:

Gary Swart

In the Trades
Messages
8,101
Reaction score
84
Points
48
Location
Yakima, WA
You've got it. There is really no point in going with a large line and high pressure with new low flow toilets. You are only using 1.6 or even just 1.28 gallons of water per flush, so high volume and high pressure are absolutely not needed and in fact would probably be damaging to a normal home toilet.
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
Most of the newer, good flushing toilets designed for homes use a 3" diameter flush valve. That allows a quick dump of sufficient amount of water from the tank to provide a good flush if the whole thing is designed and built well. Same idea with the commercial flushometer valves - you need a lot of water in a short time to make it flush, and you can't get it without a large pipe.
 

Baumgrenze

Member
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
Points
8
Location
California - Mid Left Coast
More Explicit Request

I have a bathroom where space considerations suggest that it would be more practical to do away with the flush tank on the toilet altogether.

Does a vacuum breaker flush valve deliver enough water at once to cause a standard toilet (or a low flow toilet) to flush if it is supplied via a 1/2" water line. My observations in public restrooms suggest that the feed line needs to be bigger.
 

Terry

The Plumbing Wizard
Staff member
Messages
29,946
Reaction score
3,460
Points
113
Location
Bothell, Washington
Website
terrylove.com
Does a vacuum breaker flush valve deliver enough water at once to cause a standard toilet (or a low flow toilet) to flush if it is supplied via a 1/2" water line. My observations in public restrooms suggest that the feed line needs to be bigger.

A commercial flushometer valve plumbed with a 1" supply line is very different than a tank slowly filled with a 1/2" supply line.

The 1" supply flushes in 3 to 7 seconds
The 1/2" supply may take 120 seconds to refill.

Imagine being in the shower when somebody flushes the toilet.
All of the cold would be gone, all you would have left is scalding hot water.

If you want to go with the commercial flushometer,
1) Change your water meter to a larger size and upgrade your water service to 1.5"
Then Run 1-1/2" to your bathroom set, and stub out with 1" using a 1-1/2" x 1" tee.

It should only run you a few thousand dollars.
Skimp on that, and be like all the homeowners before you that wish they hadn't tried.
 

Alan Muller

New Member
Messages
35
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Delaware
If you really want to use a flushometer, I you could put a well (bladder) tank somewhere and run a 1" line to the flush valve. That would give you a complex, noisy and expensive version of a Flushmate toilet, but you could set a top-entry pressure bowl close to the wall.

European toilets quite often have the tank ("cistern") hidden in a wall or cabinet.

If you used a 10" tank on a normal bowl, and framed up a recess for it in a "2 x 4" stud wall, you'd gain 6" of space, more or less.
 

hj

Master Plumber
Messages
33,600
Reaction score
1,037
Points
113
Location
Cave Creek, Arizona
Website
www.terrylove.com
flush

Your basic premise is incorrect. With a Sloan valve type toilet, the incoming water is doing the flushing so it has to be large enough to supply the "momentary" inflow of water to do it. A tank type toilet's flush is COMPLETELY dependent on the water in the tank, so it makes no difference what size pipe supplies it. Too small of a pipe, and it just takes longer to refill before the next flush will be adequate. Too large of a pipe and it has no benefit because the fill valve will still take the same to as the proper sized pipe to refill the tank. THEREFORE, both toilets will flush adequately, and as designed, if they have the proper sized pipes for their designs.
 

Baumgrenze

Member
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
Points
8
Location
California - Mid Left Coast
Thank You - Case Closed

Thanks to all for participating.

I've gathered the following:

1) It takes a big supply line to provide enough water to allow a 'Sloan' or vacuum breaker flush valve to flush a toilet.

2) By implication I gather that the toilet itself must be matched to a vacuum breaker flush valve.

Thanks for the other suggestions.

baumgrenze
 

hj

Master Plumber
Messages
33,600
Reaction score
1,037
Points
113
Location
Cave Creek, Arizona
Website
www.terrylove.com
toilet

First, it is NOT a vacuum breaker flush valve. It is a flush valve with a vacuum breaker, and ALL toilet fill valve also have a "vacuum breaker" function if they are an approved design. Flush valve toilets do NOT have any provision for attaching a tank, and tank type toilets have NO WAY to connect to a flush valve, so yes, the toilet matches the flushing METHOD>
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks