Fabricating A Header For Solar Collector WIthout Reducing T's

Users who are viewing this thread

Driz

Member
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
New York
I am making a couple solar collectors and no way am I paying that extortionist price for reducing T's for the header at the top. I have lots of experience with the torch and sweating ect. I want to drill and solder connect the 1/2" along the top to a 1" for the header. Can this be done using silver solder for the joint and a nice tight fit or am I farting into the wind here? I suppose regular 50/50 is out of the question for an application like this. What say ye, better than I plumber fabricators?
 

hj

Master Plumber
Messages
33,602
Reaction score
1,041
Points
113
Location
Cave Creek, Arizona
Website
www.terrylove.com
tees

IT will not work. To do that you would need a "Tee Turner" machine and that will cost a lot more than a bunch of reducing tees. You do not say what you will do about tees for the bottom manifold. And 1/2" copper is a poor choice because it has a very low surface area to volume ratio. What are you doing to increase the radiation absorbtion?
 

Driz

Member
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
New York
What I Am Thinking Is Similar To This

http://builditsolar.com/Experimental/CopperAlumCollector/Construction.htm

Something like this but shorter in length and more closely spaced together. For the fins I will use the same aluminum flashing as shown here. I see he just uses T's and half inch for the top and bottom and says it works well. Just what is the purpose of a larger lower and upper anyways, overheating? That isn't much of an issue where I live here in NY. Here all it serves is as a preheater only but every little bit helps. For a tank I scrounged a very nice stainless steel boiler fed 30 gallon cell in nice shape.
 

Scuba_Dave

Extreme DIY Homeowner
Messages
868
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Location
South of Boston, MA
Website
holidaves.com
That's a nice link
I think I have seen something like that before
I almost think 1/2" feed & more 3/8" pipes would be better

With my greenhouse exceeding 110 I am definitely going to be building a solar water heater. It would be nice to reduce the electric use
 

Bill Arden

Computer Programmer
Messages
584
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
MN, USA
Website
www.billarden.com
There are several methods to join two copper pipes together without using T's

1. It is possible to weld copper using copper wire and get a strong fillet, however it is a very difficult process to control.

2. It is also possible to soften the copper in a fire and then start with a small hole make a it flair out using a small mandrill like piece on a drill. This would also be tricky to get right.

In the end you are better off spending the money and using T's. If it is worth doing, it is worth doing right.
 

wallyworld

New Member
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I plan on building the collectors shown at www.Builditsolar.com, I emailed Gary about that same thing and he said 1/2 is alot cheaper and works fine. I'm going to use mine for heating a slab and will build mine bigger as I'm building them into a south facing wall. I'm worried about pressure drop so was thinking of upsizing the headers and still might?
 

Master Plumber Mark

Sensitivity trainer and plumber of mens souls
Messages
5,533
Reaction score
354
Points
83
Location
indianapolis indiana - land of the free, home of
Website
www.weilhammerplumbing.com
pressure drop is not an issue...

if you actually make one of those panels,
the only thing that can be a problem is proper
equal flow through all the pipes.....

as long as everything is made perfectly all the same with no restrictions in any of the pipes, , you will
have a even equal flow up through that panel,

you should be able to capture an even heat and flow through all the pipes...

Now, cranking up the pressure and volume through the panel will probably make the water take the quickest route
through only 30% of the pipes and will defeat the whole purpose and idea...
 

wallyworld

New Member
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Points
0
if you actually make one of those panels,
the only thing that can be a problem is proper
equal flow through all the pipes.....

as long as everything is made perfectly all the same with no restrictions in any of the pipes, , you will
have a even equal flow up through that panel,

you should be able to capture an even heat and flow through all the pipes...

Now, cranking up the pressure and volume through the panel will probably make the water take the quickest route
through only 30% of the pipes and will defeat the whole purpose and idea...

I don't understand your last comment, why would uping the pressure make it go thru only 30% of the tubes? Seems if every thing is equal it wouldn't matter. I would think one would want the fluid flow to be slow enough to get maximum heat transfer anyway?
 

Master Plumber Mark

Sensitivity trainer and plumber of mens souls
Messages
5,533
Reaction score
354
Points
83
Location
indianapolis indiana - land of the free, home of
Website
www.weilhammerplumbing.com
path of least resistance

I don't understand your last comment, why would uping the pressure make it go thru only 30% of the tubes? Seems if every thing is equal it wouldn't matter. I would think one would want the fluid flow to be slow enough to get maximum heat transfer anyway?




Sorry if I mi-stated what I meant to say...

the pressure does not really matter, its the VOLUME of fluid
that is passing through the panel that is important........

fluid must flow evenly up through the panels...

it almost has to "rise like bread " through them
to make them pass equal through them a ll to get the max heat out of them......


if you were kick up the PRESSURE, and do not throttle down the amount of fluid passing through the panels, the fluid will natrually just find the easiest path through the panel and it will probably bypass more than half the tubes...




does that make better sense...????
 
Last edited:

wallyworld

New Member
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Points
0
What happens when you add glycol to the system? No Burst or some other brand made for heating sysytems
 

Master Plumber Mark

Sensitivity trainer and plumber of mens souls
Messages
5,533
Reaction score
354
Points
83
Location
indianapolis indiana - land of the free, home of
Website
www.weilhammerplumbing.com
water rises.....

ok,

when I installed the damn things way back when,

if you had an array of them tied in together, you wanted the water to pass slowly up through the panels

you basically have a parallell type of system that you have set up through the panel..or panels.....filling up the bottom one inch copper manifold, then disperseing up through the 3/8 tubes....YOU WANT IT TO RISE EVENLY

the water comes in on the bottom on the left and goes out on the top on the right.....

if you put the fluid it through the panel too quickley, the water or glycol will simply find the quickest path through the panel... wether it be the first two or three tubes , bypassing and ignoreing the other tubes going up the panel.... it is takeing or finding the quickest route through the panel...

(just like in a parallel water heater layout, if anything gets out of wack, it draws much more off one and not the other)

Pressure is not really an issue, but the volume you are passing through the panel will determine how much heat you collect and also how efficient the panel is,,,,
we used to actually install these glass flow meters in the lines to the panels which could be throttled down with ball valves. to the right gpm.......

does that make any sense,

......it has to rise like bread , slowly and evenly


if you were to buy a real set of panels
it would tell you the proper GPM for max effect....


look around at panels for sale and see what they advise
 
Last edited:
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks