PEX brands

Users who are viewing this thread

peltaz

New Member
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Points
0
After Wirsbo Aquapex and propex fittings what is the consensus on the next best brands? I am pondering a galvanized repipe in a crawlspace under the house and am shopping around for ideas. I live in Arizona with only a couple of freezes a year. Thanks.
 

peltaz

New Member
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I am set on using top quality pex and top quality fittings, the best I can find. Quality of connections and the system that will be most suited for installation from a crawlspace beneath the house. Both in terms of ease of installation, number and type of fittings available and its resistance to the occasional dip below 32 degrees in southern Arizona. From this forum I have seen that a lot of folks prefer Wirsbo. I am interested in plumbers with good/bad experiences with Wirsbo in particular and pex in general. Thanks.
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
The biggest differences in pex are the means of connection. Uphonor is the only one that uses the expansion/contraction qualities of pex (memory) to make the seal. Every other one uses a crimp of some sort. The tool used to crimp usually needs to be either calibrated, or you need to use a go/no-go tool to verify it is crimped properly. This also means in cramped places, you need to access the joint multiple times, first to insert the tubing into the fitting, then to crimp, and then to verify the crimp is proper.

With a crimped connection, the ridges on the fitting can't be too high or you'd never get the tubing onto it, which means the crimp is what's squeezing things to keep the seal. It also means fewer ridges on the fitting that actually make the seal since you crimp between the ridges so the tubing is compressed against them. This also means placement of the crimp is critical as well as how tight it is.

On the expansion/contraction Uphonor fitting, the ridges are higher and there's at least an extra one since after inserting the expanded tubing to fit over the ridges, it collapses on them and creates the seal.
With the Uphonor system, you use the (moderately expensive) tool to expand the tubing and reinforment ring, then just slide it over the fitting and you're done. Placement isn't an issue...you just push the tubing up to the fitting stop and hold for a moment, then it's finished.

If you use the manual tool, you'll develop some strong arms. If you use the powered one, you'll lighten your wallet. You may be able to rent, or buy, then re-sell the tool to save money from others that have done the same thing.

SPeedwise, I'm not sure which ends up being faster, but I think Uphonor would be...I think it would be close.

In tight quarters, trying to crimp and gauge the crimp could be a real pain.
 

Redwood

Master Plumber
Messages
7,335
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
Connecticut
SPeedwise, I'm not sure which ends up being faster, but I think Uphonor would be...I think it would be close.

In tight quarters, trying to crimp and gauge the crimp could be a real pain.

Hands down Crimping is fastest!

You should try using the expansion tool in tight quarters...:eek:
 

NHmaster

Master Plumber
Messages
3,176
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
S. Maine
Just remember that because PEX is always trying to get back to its original size, a crimped fitting will always be trying to expand away from the fitting where an expanded joint will always be trying to compress itself around the fitting.
 

Kingsotall

Plunger/TurdPuncher
Messages
1,238
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Flagstaff, AZ
Just remember that because PEX is always trying to get back to its original size, a crimped fitting will always be trying to expand away from the fitting where an expanded joint will always be trying to compress itself around the fitting.

Can I get an "Amen¿"
 

NHmaster

Master Plumber
Messages
3,176
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
S. Maine
Flow rate is another concern. I have two 5 gallon containers, one with 1/2" wirsbo and the other with 1/2" Viega pex coming off the bottom. When we pull the plugs at the same time, the Wirsbo side empties in almost 1/2 the time that the Viega side does. Both sides have exactly 6' of pipe with 2 90 degree elbows attached. Watts is even slower. The same set up versus copper, copper wins against them all but not by much over the Wirsbo. Essentially, to get the same flow rates out of 1/2" Viega, Watts or any crimp typed pex, you need to go to 3/4"
 

Kingsotall

Plunger/TurdPuncher
Messages
1,238
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Flagstaff, AZ
460%3E_763461.jpg


Wirsbo installers...
 

Gary Slusser

That's all folks!
Messages
6,921
Reaction score
22
Points
38
Location
Wherever I park the motorhome.
Website
www.qualitywaterassociates.com
Flow rate is another concern. I have two 5 gallon containers, one with 1/2" wirsbo and the other with 1/2" Viega pex coming off the bottom. When we pull the plugs at the same time, the Wirsbo side empties in almost 1/2 the time that the Viega side does. Both sides have exactly 6' of pipe with 2 90 degree elbows attached. Watts is even slower. The same set up versus copper, copper wins against them all but not by much over the Wirsbo. Essentially, to get the same flow rates out of 1/2" Viega, Watts or any crimp typed pex, you need to go to 3/4"
Proving that PEX should be run homerun (one continuous piece) from a manifold to the fixture rather than in branch and tee as copper must be.

That reduces the ID needed because there are only 2 fittings needed; one on each end.

I assume that the above test is not just of the brand of PEX, that it includes the manufacturers' fittings. If you wanted to test just the tubing you would use QEST or Sharkbite compression fittings on both brands of tubing. And minimize or actually remove elbows or it looks as if there may be a bias toward copper against PEX or one brand of PEX is favored over others. And if you look at friction loss chart, PEX beats the same size copper.
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
Because Wirsbo (Uphonor) expands the tubing to make the connection, the ID of the fitting can be larger than one where you just insert the fitting into the 'normal' diameter of the tubing. The ID of the fitting IS larger with Wirsbo than any others that rely on a crimp.
 

NHmaster

Master Plumber
Messages
3,176
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
S. Maine
Friction loss yes, flow rates no. The ID of 1/2" pex is considerably smaller than 1/2" copper. yes I am testing pipe and fittings. One brand of 1/2" pex pipe to another makes no difference on flow.

Home run systems do alleviate some of the problem but are expensive and take miles more pipe negating the cost and speed advantage of pex.
 
Last edited:

Gary Slusser

That's all folks!
Messages
6,921
Reaction score
22
Points
38
Location
Wherever I park the motorhome.
Website
www.qualitywaterassociates.com
It sounds as if you are biased toward copper. The labor savings alone makes PEX the least expensive of any material and with the price of copper today, PEX is overall less expensive.

PEX and other plastics are better for water quality because unlike copper nothing in water can harm plastic and plastics are inert, they don't add anything to water, again, unlike copper does.
 

Redwood

Master Plumber
Messages
7,335
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
Connecticut
Home run systems do alleviate some of the problem but are expensive and take miles more pipe negating the cost and speed advantage of pex.

They also make hot water recirculation impossible.

My preferance is a combination of the 2 systems using properly sized lines to feed mini manifolds near the point of use. Recirculation is easy with that type of system. It also saves about a mile of tubing per house...:eek:
 

NHmaster

Master Plumber
Messages
3,176
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
S. Maine
Imagine that, someone calling me biased:D

Not really though. I do like to explore all sides of an argument and a product though. Many see PEX as the greatest thing to happen to piping since copper replaced galvanized. Make no mistake, I am not against pex. My company installs miles and miles of it for both domestic water supply and radiant heat. However, I do like to keep an ear to the ground so to speak and I do like to research the crap out of something before I decide to use it. After all the research I have done, i have decided that Uponor has the best warranty, the best flow rate and the best fitting and connection system.

How's that for biased?:eek:
 

99k

Radon Contractor and Water Treatment
Messages
460
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Location
Fairfield Co.,Connecticut
Website
www.78radon.com
Flow rate is another concern. I have two 5 gallon containers, one with 1/2" wirsbo and the other with 1/2" Viega pex coming off the bottom. When we pull the plugs at the same time, the Wirsbo side empties in almost 1/2 the time that the Viega side does. Both sides have exactly 6' of pipe with 2 90 degree elbows attached. Watts is even slower. The same set up versus copper, copper wins against them all but not by much over the Wirsbo. Essentially, to get the same flow rates out of 1/2" Viega, Watts or any crimp typed pex, you need to go to 3/4"


I do agree that 1/2 copper tubing is very similar to the performance of 3/4 PEX. I especially had an issue when at a customer's house and the outside hose bibb used 1/2 PEX ... talk about wimpy flow and pressure...
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks