Navien Tankless Water Heater Comments and questions

Users who are viewing this thread

Dana

In the trades
Messages
7,889
Reaction score
509
Points
113
Location
01609
OMG: 13yr old who thinks water is unlimited resource for her showers is an understatement. She is effectively training my 7yrs old daughter those same habits. I would say that my wife is the master of giving me cold showers, but I think she lurks here. I'm in the military, so taking a hot shower is a luxury anyway, so I'm used to it. :D

Is there enough headroom in the crawl to install even a 30" drainwater heat recovery heat exchanger vertically in a drain down stream from the shower? SFAIK there's no subsidy for them in GA, but it'll boost the "apparent efficiency" of a condensing Navien into the 130-140% range during showers, reducing the water heating bill for the kids. (It's a few hundred bucks if you buy them wholesale.) It may be slow to pay off if your gas prices are low and you're running a Navien, but it's pretty quick for propane-fired water heating.

OTOH, if you used an occupancy sensor switch for the bathroom lights and set it up to time out in 5 or 6 minutes (8 min, if you're feeling generous or your wife objects) you might be able to re-train them to take shorter showers, for less than $50 in hardware costs, eh? ;-) (I have both the drainwater heat recovery and occupancy-sensor light switch going to keep my 10 year old reined in, or from having to listen to my wife's opionions about the lack of hot water through the closed bathroom door.)
 
Last edited:

ImpliedConsent

New Member
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
GA United States
Thought I'd share install pictures :D The new tankless is in nearly the same spot as the tank.
 

Attachments

  • new_navien_nr210a.jpg
    new_navien_nr210a.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 1,996
  • 17yr_old_ao_smith.jpg
    17yr_old_ao_smith.jpg
    77.1 KB · Views: 2,020

ImpliedConsent

New Member
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
GA United States
Err... now that I look at Navien's fluff marketing, I'm concerned that my install wasn't actually complete. Can y'all tell me how I should resolve this? The quote was for external circulation.
 

Attachments

  • new_navien_nr210a.jpg
    new_navien_nr210a.jpg
    41.2 KB · Views: 2,266
  • navien_a_model.jpg
    navien_a_model.jpg
    74.4 KB · Views: 2,857

ImpliedConsent

New Member
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
GA United States
Err... now that I look at Navien's fluff marketing, I'm concerned that my install wasn't actually complete. Can y'all tell me how I should resolve this? The quote was for external circulation.

OK, finally figured this out. Since I do not have a dedicated recirculation line (most homes don't), they installed a Instant Hot Water Recirculating System Sensor Valve Kit. That hot water inlet (Navien fluff pic) is for the dedicated recirculation line. Since the Navien has a built-in recirculation pump, the valve kits work perfectly. So, my longest runs (master bath and kids bath) had the kits installed. Since now I know what it is, I might install another at the kitchen sink. It's the longest wait time of 15s.
 

shugs

New Member
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Implied,

I noticed on the Watts site that they state those valve kits are not supposed to be used with tankless. That was my reading of it anyway, though I guess if it works, it works. There's something I'd like to understand about these valves and recirc systems:
If they essentially use your cold supply line as the return recirculation line for the hot until it reaches 98* don't you now have essentially 98* water in your cold line? So don't I end up negating the "savings" by having to run the cold at the tap for ~10 seconds in order to get a nice brisk rinse after shaving?
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,770
Reaction score
1,190
Points
113
Location
New England
Unless you have a dedicated return line, you will heat up the cold line as well.
 

ImpliedConsent

New Member
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
GA United States
Implied,

I noticed on the Watts site that they state those valve kits are not supposed to be used with tankless. That was my reading of it anyway, though I guess if it works, it works. There's something I'd like to understand about these valves and recirc systems:
If they essentially use your cold supply line as the return recirculation line for the hot until it reaches 98* don't you now have essentially 98* water in your cold line? So don't I end up negating the "savings" by having to run the cold at the tap for ~10 seconds in order to get a nice brisk rinse after shaving?

Yea, I'm gonna have to take a picture of what they installed. It's not exactly what I found on the Watts site. I do know that it works. When I wake up in the morning to shave, that hot water is there immediately and it's the furthest run from the WH. I usually had to wait. I know that I do NOT have a dedicated recirc line.
 

ImpliedConsent

New Member
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
GA United States
OK, this is what they installed on the 2 long runs. This one is in the kids bathroom. Apparently there is a thermal valve in there somewhere, which, when it gets to a certain temp, it opens/closes. Any clue?
 

Attachments

  • P1010491_800_600.jpg
    P1010491_800_600.jpg
    45 KB · Views: 2,447

AAnderson

In the Trades
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Aptos, CA
I'm going to add to this topic again. when they first hit our local central california coast market, I liked them but the problem of low flow cut out became a problem and changing boards became a regular task for us. What did become a problem was the issue remained after the 1 year labor ran out and Navien would not honor replacement of known problems with these by paying to have these replaced.
Considering the near non response of the sales distributor and the full mailbox of tech support on weekends, I wouldn't recommend this line for any reason. The recirculation pump feature in the A models can not be set up with a remote on demand feature and the pump has limited head capability. I challenged the sales rep how 98% efficiency is achieved with temps at 120 or lower at low flows, he couldn't answer that and has quite touting this at trainings.
We've been installing tankless for over 30 years and have seen our share of what works and what does not. Navien has failed to realize service makes or breaks a company and in my book they lay near at the bottom with Bosch.
 

Dana

In the trades
Messages
7,889
Reaction score
509
Points
113
Location
01609
98% efficiency is much less a function of the flow rate & output temp than of the incoming water temp. The output temp is only a 3rd order factor, but at low flow low-fire the lower turbulence on both the fire & water sides of the heat exchanger can start to create insulating laminar flows that'll knock a few points off the raw combustion efficiency. Whether it's actually 95% vs. 98% at minimum fire is hardly as relevant as what it is at 20-40% of full fire from a total fuel use point of view. But whether the output is 100F or 130F makes less than 0.01% difference. But if the INCOMING water temp is much over 90F you won't be making 98% thermal effciency at any output temp.

Sorry to hear that their customer support is so abyssmal though.
 

Zl700

DIY Senior Member
Messages
257
Reaction score
4
Points
18
Location
Western NY
Tankless testing (all brands) follow a standard testing procedure for determination of combustion efficiency and EF.
10 Code of Federal Regulations Section 430.23.
In a nutshell its a series of draws at different flow rates and gallons.

So if Navien is misstating efficiency so is all others.

I wont argue about what it takes to get to it, yes it involves cooler inlet water, but so do the 80%ers to achieve 82-84%.

Whats the big deal with changing a part, make it part of the charged annual service
 

Dana

In the trades
Messages
7,889
Reaction score
509
Points
113
Location
01609
Tankless testing (all brands) follow a standard testing procedure for determination of combustion efficiency and EF.
10 Code of Federal Regulations Section 430.23.
In a nutshell its a series of draws at different flow rates and gallons.

So if Navien is misstating efficiency so is all others.

I wont argue about what it takes to get to it, yes it involves cooler inlet water, but so do the 80%ers to achieve 82-84%.

Whats the big deal with changing a part, make it part of the charged annual service

When did the EF test change from 6 equal draws are made during the first 6 hours of at 24 hours test perior for a total of 64.3 gallons, (at an unspecified draw rate?) They've been talking about changing it for years, but SFAIK the DOE spec hasn't changed yet. If there's a new procedure, don't give me the nutshell, point me to the document please- I'd LOVE to see what they've cooked up!

All tankless units have traditionally overstated actual as-used efficiency, since real-world use isn't 6 10gallon+ draws per day. The fractional losses of short-cycles for the quick rinse or hand washing add up. Every ignition cycle & flue purge throws away some fuel or heat, and real-world use is more than 6 draws/day. The steady-state efficiency of a hot water heater isn't nearly as important as it's ignition & flue-purge losses x draws per day, and the average draw size. A low-mass fin-tube or condensing boiler only settles into the steady-state efficiency somewhere between 3-5 minutes into a firing, so the steady-state number is only relevant for showers & tub fills (which are granted, the largest VOLUME of water draw.) The 15-100 second draws can and do affect the average efficiency adversely.

The 6-draw 64.3 gallon EF number is a better comparison between different tank heaters than different tankless units (or comparing a tanks to tankless). But that too is fraught with as-used error, since the volume of use effects it's average efficiency. Steady-state most tanks will run right around 80%, but their EF numbers are much lower. But those who use less than the 64.3 gallons/day number will average efficiencies lower than the EF number, and real hot-water pigs can hit well OVER that rating.

Unless it's on a recirculator most people will see temps well below 90F for incoming water, and condensing efficiencies of condensing tankless units will still be quite high, but the real world average will be closer to 90% with a condensing tankless than a 98% steady-state or 0.98EF number might imply. See: http://old.aceee.org/conf/08whforum/presentations/1a_davis.pdf
 

ednaruth

New Member
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
connecticut
Jan 2011....I have a Navien tankless hot water heater....and I would never buy another one...I just got off the phone with the tech dept....and when I said that you don't have any qualified techs he said we aren't required to...that if anyone wants to be trained they have the classes...well a lot of good that does for me the consumer ...it is a little late ..but I am so savy now...if one more thing goes wrong >>>I will find another company who will back up their product and I get rid of this ...can you imagine buying something and them telling you it isn't up to them to have the qualified techs....see them in court....
 

6t7gto

DIY Junior Member
Messages
58
Reaction score
1
Points
8
Location
Bedford, Ohio
My experience yesterday.
My friend, Kenny, has a rental that he had a Navien installed about a year ago.
After numerous calls from the renter about improper water temp variations and reading the manual and trying different solutions, Kenny called out someone to look at it.
Rocky, the service man, showed up and told us he has plenty of experience with Navien. Even the plumbing company owner has one installed in his home.
First Rocky inspected the intake and exhaust lines from the outside.
Then he went inside and looked at the unit.
He called tech support and explained the problem to them.
They questioned him on the size of the gas line feeding the unit. OK on that point.
Had him check gas pressure at the unit. Not quite what they wanted as the pressure fluctuated as the unit cycled. He replaced the 3/4" gas shutoff valve with one that has a larger ID. Gas pressure hardly fluctuated at all after the change out.
Unit still not operating correctly.
Rocky pulled the inlet and outlet water filter screens. Inlet was pretty plugged up. Cleaned that and reinstalled.
Rocky mentioned he has come across a solenoid that would act up. He removed it and found a broken o-ring. He replaced the o-ring and now the unit would not make hot water at all.
He called tech support again and was told to check the flow sensor. The remaining broken piece of o-ring found its way to the sensor. He replaced the sensor and the unit fired up.
Water temps were checked at different locations in the house and they varied no more than 5 degrees.
The renter called kenny this morning and told him that this morning's shower was the best he has had since he moved in.
Rocky's opinion is the Navien is a well built unit. He prefers them over other units he has serviced but it depends on the application.

David

P.S.
Kenny was ready to pull this unit out and install a tank type.
 
Last edited:

RichardNC

New Member
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Pinehurst, NC
Hello everyone,

I am considering getting a navien tankless water heater. Originally I decided against tankless because of the maintenance issue but these naviens claim that they don't require any maintenance. My plumber is the one that told me about them. They also can be vented with pvc instead of stainless. Pretty neat. Anybody heard of them or has used them. Thanks

I just had a Navien installed in my 6000 sf home in Pinehurst NC. I got the unit with the option of a circulating pump and controller. The plumbing co. installed in my garage. It works great. I had three water heater for the house, each with a 50 gal tank. I was keeping 150 gal. of water at 125 degrees 24/7 which was a huge waste. I travel a lot and we have other homes that we visit and the Pinehurst house sits empty for two to three weeks at a time. When I go I just touch the pad and the circulating pump shuts down and I have zero activity until I return. The plumber has a service to come by once a year and flush (clean out) the system, but that is what people are supposed to do with a regular hot water tank and they never do. I was looking at replacing my tanks as they were getting old and the cost was estimated at $3,100. My Navien system cost $3,800 with return lines installed and insulation of pipes, running the gas line, etc. I could care less if the $700 difference is not saved right away, I have a great system, water is instantly at the outlets, no problem with showers going. What's not to like? I had no preference at all, my plumber recommended Navien and I liked the fact it had a little cirulating pump included in the unit. My friend in Tennessee built a new big house and he installed two Rennai heaters and had to install external pumps to circulate the water and he put in a small 10 gal water heater as an instant reserve. I did mine with one unit and no heated reserve.
 

drdrain1

New Member
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Sacramento, CA / Georgia
navien tankless

navien is the best I've tried thus far. no temp variation, built in recirculation and stainless steel heat exchanger. definately more reliable than the 'big 3'. and as for tank type heaters & 30% of energy usage for hot water? these people must be taking cold showers & using cold water for most everything. tank type heaters in real world operating conditions are 50 - 60% efficient on their best day unless you go with commercial. also- good warranty support on navien heaters.
 

Dana

In the trades
Messages
7,889
Reaction score
509
Points
113
Location
01609
navien is the best I've tried thus far. no temp variation, built in recirculation and stainless steel heat exchanger. definately more reliable than the 'big 3'. and as for tank type heaters & 30% of energy usage for hot water? these people must be taking cold showers & using cold water for most everything. tank type heaters in real world operating conditions are 50 - 60% efficient on their best day unless you go with commercial. also- good warranty support on navien heaters.

There is scant evidence to support that assertion, and plenty to support a different conclusion. The DOE EF test consistently over-rates tankless units due to the unrealistically larger volume and fewer draws. Real world performance of tankless comes nowhere near the EF test numbers, but tanks do at DOE test daily volumes, and easily exceed their ratings in high volume use.

I could no longer find it on line, but the results of PG & E sponsored testing you're both overstating the real-world efficiencies and understating the lowly tanks. See if you can't dig it up somewhere:

Testing Water Heaters with Different Draw Profiles
Robert Davis, PE
ACEEE Water Heating Forum

In real world residential apps the "98% efficient" Naviens do no better than high-80s due to short-cycling and flue-purge losses, whereas in a high-use draw profile with a crummy 40 gallon atmospheric drafted tank with standing pilot that tests at 0.59 EF in a DOE test can easily hit the high-60s. With cheap tanks it's all about volume- at low volume usage it falls off an efficiency cliff, but at steady state (the only condition in which a Navien is actually anywhere near 98% efficient), they're all around 78-82%. At ~28 gallons/day use the same 0.59EF that's pushing 70% on a high-use profile is down around 40%. Same heater, different volume.

With tankless it's all about the number & volume of individual draws and time between draws, since the flue purge is a fixed loss with each draw, but there's also some amount of standby loss from the heat abandoned in the HX between draws.

Water heating fraction of total energy use in a house is well UNDER 30% as a national average, but the national average heating/cooling load is also much higher than the CA average due to climate differences. In MN or ND even people who take long showers won't be exceeding 20% as the hot water fraction, whereas in southern FL it could be close to 50% for some people.

The DOE EF test does not include electricity use in tankless heaters too, which for Navien has both a standby and active use components.

Endless-shower folks get more bang/buck (and higher net-efficiency at a lower overall cost) out of a 0.55-060EF 40 gallon tank and a drainwater heat recovery heat exchanger than going condensing-tankless, but for the fill-a-big-spa types a condensing tankless is as good as it gets.
 

JimmyTony

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Bend, Oregon
New Construction

Hey Guys,
Im getting ready to build a new house and was looking at in-floor heat using a tankless combined with a small tank to act as a "shock absorber" to keep the tankless, from cycling on all the time. In reading this thread I've come across some great posts by Dana and some others about this kind of system. I'm not a plumber, and could use some help getting a good mix of cost and efficiency in putting a system together. Any thoughts would be appreciated, Thanks!
 

Dana

In the trades
Messages
7,889
Reaction score
509
Points
113
Location
01609
This really should have been a new thread, eh? (It has nothing to do with Navien, other than that Navien doesn't void the warranty when their units are used for space heating.)

Every reasonable heating system design starts with a good heat-loss estimate/calculation.

If you build the radiant in to a concrete slab, it doesn't need a buffer tank.

There are cheap ways of doing radiant with a tankless, but if your design condition water temp requirements are low enough, there may be better options.

In climates as mild as Bend, for new construction, you have the option of spending the money on high efficiency building envelope rather than a high heating system. If you target design condition heat loads to be <<20KBTU/hr (not tough to hit for 2000-2800' house in Bend's climate, but it has to be designed), at which point you can have your cake and eat it too, since you can then heat & cool the place with a highly efficient ductless mini-split. (Even if it's not as cushy as radiant floors...) If you're not on a gas main and would be otherwise be using propane, it would be practically INSANE not to use an R410A refrigerant heat pump for primary heating in that climate. (If propane-fired radiant, even R410A air-to-water air source heat pumps start looking pretty good in terms of 10 year NPV compared to condensing propane, even though they're far more expensive than mini-splits.)

Consider building to Zone-5 specs in the table 0.2 on p10 in this document, for starters:

http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/reports/rr-1005-building-america-high-r-value-high-performance-residential-buildings-all-climate-zones

Note that those R values are not center-cavity, but rather "whole wall" R with thermal bridging of the framing included. An R30 wall isn't a 2x10 studwall with R30 batts- when the thermal bridging of all framing is factored in that would come out at ~ R21-R22 for homes with "typical" or "average" framing fractions. But a 2x4" wall with R13 batts or spray cellulose + 3.25" of exterior polyisocyanurate rigid-board is ~R30, with typical framing fractions.

Air infiltration is a LARGE factor in total heat load- designing a continuous primary air barrier on all 6 sides of the cube and having a Konstruction-Kommandant to enforce air sealing is critical, as is blower-door testing & remediation on the main shell as soon as you have the windows & doors installed. Typical pretty-good construction comes in at ~ 10 air changes per hour @ 50 pascals pressure (ACH/50), the standard leakage test. The IBC 2009 standard specs out 7 ACH/50 or less, which is usually achievable as a post-construction (read "post test-failure") retrofit. But to be very efficient you need to be under 3 ACH/50 and under 1.5 is better, and relatively easy to hit, if you have a plan and execute on it.

Air sealing is by far the most cost-effective envelope performance upgrade you can do- a well insulated wind tunnel is a waste. Put a bead of caulk or acoustic sealant under & between stud-wall plates, foam seal & gasket foundation sills, caulk every sheet of structural sheathing to the studs, etc etc. It's cheap & quick, but it has to be consistent. On upper floor ceilings use OSB or ply on the underside of the joists/truss-chords (you'll need it to hold up the 20" of cellulose without bowing), and detail it similarly as an air barrier. Don't mess around with stuffing fiberglass in around window framing either- use the appropriate compliant foams.

Only use insulated doors. Don't use sliding doors- they all leak like crazy with age (some even when new.) Swinging patio doors/french doors can be made to seal better. (But see notes about minimizing glazed area.)

Minimize the total glazed area except where passive solar gains have been site-simulated and optimized. Every square foot of U-0.34 pretty-good window is an R3 hole in your R30 wall, with literally 10x the heat loss per square foot. Size & locate them for daylighting & egress needs.

Use fixed (non-opening) windows where you don't absolutely need to open a window- they leak LOT less air. Where they must open, use casement & awning types, since they leak less air than double-hungs & sliders, and they give more egress & ventilation cross-section per square foot of glazing too.

Avoid recessed lights, particularly those that would penetrate into attic or cathedral-ceilings. Even IC rated air-tight versions aren't usually all that air-tight, and make thin spots in the insulation.

If taking the foam-clad framed building approach, a LOT of money can be saved by using reclaimed roofing insulation from commercial re-roofing jobs. An overcoat of R18-R24 iso or eps comes in at well under $5K for most reasonable-sized houses, which roughly triples the whole-wall R-value of a 2x4 fiber-insulated wall, and more than doubles that of a 2x6 wall. (If virgin stock it could easily hit $12K+.) Going to an air-tight R30 with glazing reduced to under 15% of floor area (as opposed to the ~18% new construction average) can cut the heat load of a house down to 1/3 or less of a typical-leakage typical glazing fraction code-min house, without having to live in dank darkness.

To see what foam clad timber frame looks like, check out the retrofit the section titled "An architect works on his own house":

http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/visiting-energy-smart-designers-and-builders-maine

(Note the 1-part expanding foam in the pictures that seals the seams of his 6" of reclaimed iso board.)

Other foam-cladding retrofits can be seen here: http://thousandhomechallenge.com/case-studies

If you ARE on the natural gas grid, running low-temp radiant with a condensing water is roughly comparable to heating with a mini-split for a low-heat load house, but you pay quite a bit up front for that extra-cushy warmth underfoot. There's no payback on it, other than the "aahhhhhh" factor when it's 10F outside.
 

JimmyTony

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Bend, Oregon
Thanks for the reply Dana, and the info.
I should provide more info. Radiant appeals to me because I can get it done in a slab for cheaper than a crawl space with a finished floor on it plus a separate heating system like a conventional forced air system. I know thats not the case for everyone, but it is for me. The ductless split is intrigueing but we have pets and allergy sensitive kids, so I was trying to take out the air movement from the equation. (dander and dust). Also, an aquantanace who had a split system installed says the moving air always feels a bit cold. Could be just her I guess. Also, I wanted to use the tankless for houshold water as well, so I thought thats where a buffer tank would come into play. i.e. prevent hand washing from forcing the tankless to kick on every time, not to mention the cold water sandwiches. As I say, I am not a plumber, but I'm trying to educate myself so I can make the best choice.
Yes, an air tight envelope is part of the plan, likely a low density foam/ cellulose hybrid for starters, with major caulking, so I feel pretty good about starting with as reduced a demand as possible.
We do not have the option of ntural gas, so propane or electricity are my options. I worry about the volatility of propane prices more than electricity prices in the NW, Propane is about $2.40/ gal and electricity is about $.10 /kwh which is about a wash before comparing efficiencies, but I also don't know if efficiency cclaims can be compared between propane units and electrical, and if they can be believed, especially heat pumps. I guess I've started to question all the assumptions I'd made while planning the house. I suppose thats good because I'm not locked into one idea/ solution/. But I need to come to a decision here pretty soon, and got to this site after my plumber laughed at my idea of doing infloor heat with electricity. He suggested propane and swears by Navien tankless. Thats the system he used with his in-floor system in the same neighborhood. What I've read here so far makes me lean more towards a Noritz or Rinnei, but obviously I'd have to committ to propane. The one thing I know for sure is that I don't know enough, so thanks again for the info and if you see a good heating solution somewhere in all this let me know.
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks