(206) 949-5683, Top Rated Plumber, Seattle
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Aquia I vs. Aquia II MaP tests

  1. #1
    DIY Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Bruno, CA
    Posts
    2

    Default Aquia I vs. Aquia II MaP tests

    I downloaded a chart from San Francisco Public Utilities (SFPUC) and they have listed the Aquia EL with an 800 MaP score and they have the Aquia EL II and III listed with a 500 MaP score.

    My questions is what is the difference between the Aquia and the Aquia II that would change the score so much?

    Is the Aquia more effecient than the II?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Forum Admin, Expert Plumber Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Bothell, Washington
    Posts
    14,202
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default


    The Aquia I, has the larger trapway.
    The II and the III use the internal trapway and only a flange adapter at the floor.
    500 grams is fine, most feel that anything over 500 is overkill anyway.

  3. #3
    DIY Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Bruno, CA
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Thanks Terry,

    I'm one of those guys who try to get the most bang for their buck. so to speak.
    I was concerned about the MaP numbers. I you say 500 is fine then I'll trust that. I suppose anything will be better than my old 3.6g toilet.

    I never would have thought that I'd be so excited about getting a toilet. I guess it shows my age or it shows what I put a premium value on. LOL.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •