Redwood
Master Plumber
Be glad it wasn't Micky Mouse...
LOL
LOL
I've worked in union and non-union shops. I've supervised union and non-union workers.
Unions make everyone equal. Unfortunately everyone isn't equal. If you're a terrible employee, unions make sure you're treated as well as an average worker. If you're a spectacular employee, unions make sure you're treated as well as an average worker.
Unions are a good deal for the slackers and a bad deal for the ambitious.
]Negative!!! Again here is a common misconception of union's the union's protect the slacker's. I can only speak from the perspective of trade union's, but I still belive that is a twisted view of union's. Beside's ambitious non union worker's are still making less the the union people. If your good at what you do and there is a coworker holding you back that person will get what is coming."What goes around comes around."
Business interests led by the Chamber of Commerce lobbied extensively for right-to-work legislation in the southern states.[4][5][6][7] Opponents argue right-to-work laws create a free-rider problem, in which non-union employees (who are bound by the terms of the union contract even though they are not members of the union) benefit from collective bargaining without paying union dues.[4] They also contend outlawing compulsory union dues makes union activities less sustainable, that the laws prevent free contracts between unions and business owners, and that this makes it harder for unions to organize and less attractive for people to join a union. For these reasons, they often refer to right-to-work states as "right-to-fire" states, and "non-right-to-work" states as "free collective bargaining" states.
Critics from organized labor have argued since the late 1970s[8] that while the National Right to Work Committee purports to engage in grass-roots lobbying on behalf of the "little guy", the National Right to Work Committee was formed by a group of southern businessmen with the express purpose of fighting unions, and that they "added a few workers for the purpose of public relations."[9] They also argue that the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation has received millions of dollars in grants from foundations controlled by major U.S. industrialists like the New York based John M. Olin Foundation, Inc. which grew out of a family manufacturing business,[9][10][11] and other right wing groups.[8]
Opponents further argue that because unions are weakened by these laws, wages are lowered and worker safety and health is endangered. They cite statistics from the United States Department of Labor showing, for example, that in 2003 the rate of workplace fatalities per 100,000 workers was highest in right-to-work states. Nineteen of the top 25 states for worker fatality rates were right-to-work states, while 3 of the bottom 25 states were right-to-work states.
Right to work laws can also be argued against on the basis of libertarian principles, as a government interference in labour relations[12][13]. However, some libertarians say just the opposite.[14][15][16
This is a topic that always facinated me. It certainly can relate one way or another to everyone who visits this site. I will come out and say I'm a proud union brother who always weighs the pros and the cons, but by far I think the pros out weigh the cons. I would like anyone being a tradesman,contractor,homeowner, etc. to please post on this subject and continue to discuss and debate.
By the way post what state you are licensed in and maybe I can come up with a few things.
This is awkward, but...
It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.
If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.