Open-Loop Heat Pump - Power Efficiency

Users who are viewing this thread

Sixlashes

Plumber in Previous Life
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Pensacola. FL
I have gone through numerous previous posts and cannot find the answer to this. Please forgive me if I overlooked it.

QUESTION: How much power will a 1/3 hp or a 1/2 hp submerged well pump running at 70% capacity use? I cannot apply the figures I get from Grundfos/Franklin Motors/F&W for my situation. I am confident from reading previous posts that there are folks in this forum that are well versed in this.

BACKGROUND: I am building my home and plan to install a Climatemaster Model 049 - 4 ton geothermal heat pump. I am trying to determine which pump (open or closed loop) will be more economical for the heat sink since the water temperature and power consumption of the chosen pump clearly impacts the overall system EER/COP.

I have an abundance of good water at a depth of 50-55 feet here in NW Florida at year-round water temp of 68-69 degrees. If I utilize a horizontal loop 6' deep, my water temp will vary from the well water temp by approx 10 degrees. This does not take into account ground heat saturation during the long summer cooling load here in Florida which will further lower the efficiency of the closed loop. Will the increased EER/COP values at the more attractive well water temps be worth the added power consumption of the well?

Since I am already installing an irrigation well, the cost of installing an additional well for the water source is more competitive than installing a ground loop. I plan to use the irrigation well as the injection well to minimize the possibility of fouling the screens with the small amount of iron present (assuming air gets into system). I have been told by drillers in the area that pulling large amounts of water at a high rate of flow back out of the injection well should eliminate\reduce clogging of the injection well screens.

I am leaning toward the open system, but do not want the cost of running a well pump to make it more expensive. I am convinced we are on the precipice of vastly increasing utility costs and plan to live in this house for the rest of my life. What sayest thou?
 

Bill Arden

Computer Programmer
Messages
584
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
MN, USA
Website
www.billarden.com
You left out the most important factor.

You need to know what the water level is while the pump is running. This is generally not too much higher than the "static water depth".

The total well depth is not important as long as it can supply the water at the required rate without the water level dropping too far.
 

Sixlashes

Plumber in Previous Life
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Pensacola. FL
The static water level is approx 45 feet. The drawdown at 12 gpm should be no more than 10 feet. A knowledgable neighbor told me his is no more than 10 feet for his lawn irrigation pump.
 

Bill Arden

Computer Programmer
Messages
584
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
MN, USA
Website
www.billarden.com
The static water level is approx 45 feet. The drawdown at 12 gpm should be no more than 10 feet. A knowledgeable neighbor told me his is no more than 10 feet for his lawn irrigation pump.

So you are lifting the water ~50 feet.

1. Calculate amount of water per minute.
GPM =

2. Convert that to pounds.
Pounds = GPM * "Pounds per gallon"

3. Calculate the "Ideal" HP you would be using
HP = (Pounds / 33,000) * feet

4. double? it to make up for inefficiency of the pump

5. Convert HP to watts
watts = Hp * 745

6. multiply by the amount of time it will be running. 70%?

7. Multiply it to get Kwh per month
kWh = Watts * 24(hours) * 31(days) / 1000

8. multiply kWh by your price per kWh


Anyone have there calculator handy?
 

Sixlashes

Plumber in Previous Life
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Pensacola. FL
Great info. I think I have my brain wrapped around this.

One last question - Ideally, I want a 1/3 hp pump because of the low head. I cannot find a decent brand in a third horse. They have been discontinued. I am forced to buy a 1/2 horse, either Grundfos, Gould or F & W. Will the 1/2 hp pump use much more power than the 1/3 hp doing the same amount of work?

Okay, I lied. :D Second question comes to mind - In your opinion, which of the three is the best to go with, and are any to be avoided?

Thank you for sharing your experience.
 

Bill Arden

Computer Programmer
Messages
584
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
MN, USA
Website
www.billarden.com
>Okay, I lied. Second question comes to mind - In your opinion, which of the three is the best to go with, and are any to be avoided?

In my opinion, you should run open loop first and use the savings to put in a more efficient drilled closed loop system. This is what I am planing.

The costs of "caseless" vertical wells should come down as drillers get used to drilling only until it gets difficult.

Drillers also need to change there rigs so that they can quickly change the angle they drill at so that you can drill at an angle to cover more area while reducing the size of the trench where the pipes are connected.

I've been thinking of building a rig that can drill 50 feet using 1-1/4 pipe and then pushing a pair of 1/2 pipe down each well before filling it with sand and pulling the 1-1/4 pipe back out.

Edit: oh. I think you are asking about which brand of pump to get, not which option to go with.
 
Last edited:

Bob NH

In the Trades
Messages
3,310
Reaction score
9
Points
0
Location
New Hampshire
The Goulds 10GS05R is the best match in the Goulds line.

I would use a variable frequency drive on the 10GS05R pump. To match your system it would run a little slower than the standard 60 Hz. There are several brands.
http://www.hitachi.us/supportingdocs/forbus/inverters/Support/SM-E256P_X200.pdf

The price for one at the link is less than $150 and a 3-phase motor is often less expensive than a single phase motor.
http://www.driveswarehouse.com/c-149-drives.aspx?categories_id=21

http://www.wwpp.us/goulds/goulds-submersible-2-wire.shtml

You could dial in the speed (not an active control) to match the pump to your needs, but you could use it as a control if you had reason to do so.

The ability to set the speed lets you adjust for differences in head losses in the system, and you could use it to optimize the pump/compressor power.

Inverter-rated 3-phase motors are common.
 
Last edited:

Sixlashes

Plumber in Previous Life
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Pensacola. FL
Bob NH,

Will using the inverter give me the same problems as the constant pressure pump systems that seem to have a bad rap in this forum?

Thanks.
 

Bob NH

In the Trades
Messages
3,310
Reaction score
9
Points
0
Location
New Hampshire
The VFD for your system isn't applied in the manner that is used for constant-pressure systems described on this board.

Most of the problems arise out of trying to make inexpensive constant-pressure control systems with inexpensive pressure transducers or pressure switches. The systems tend to cycle and hunt while they respond to varying demands of the system. You don't have that kind of system.

The inverter will not involve varying control, pressure transducers, or cycling the pump on and off to meet varying demand. It will simply convert the 240 VAC single phase input power at 60 Hz to 240 Volt 3-phase power to a frequency somewhere between 50 and 60 Hz to provide the pressure you need for the heat exchanger. You will dial the speed/pressure/flow that you need and leave it there.

Because the pump delivers more pressure and flow than you need you will never need to operate it above the rated speed, so you can use a standard pump with a VFD rated 3-phase motor of the specified horsepower. I know that Goulds sells pumps with such motors.

VFDs are used in many applications where saving energy is an important part of the control system. They are used because they save energy. There is some conversion loss but the net effect is to save energy. There is not standby loss because the VFD will not be powered when the system is off.

If you can match the pump to the system without a VFD that is the most efficient way to go.

If your system can accept higher flow then the extra pumping power will probably be balanced by reduced compressor power.

If you have to throttle the pump significantly then you can save energy with a VFD.
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks