dual T&P valves a good idea?

Users who are viewing this thread

northman

Member
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
Washington
doing a remodel where I have extensively re-worked the plumbing. Water heater is in a walk-out basement, was plumbed with the usual 150 psi relief valve out the side of the tank, piped down toward the floor. There was also a 125 psi relief valve on the hot pipe shortly after exiting the tank, plumbed up and outside through the nearby exterior wall.

Is this a good idea, should I go a little out of my way to incorporate this into my new piping scheme? Or should I just keep the 150 psi valve and call it good?


Greg
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
I'd probably take it out. It may have been added as a pressure limiter device for a valve(s) that didn't like the high pressure if the system is closed and doesn't have an expansion tank. It is a bandaid. A properly designed system shouldn't need one.

Do a search here on expansion tanks and see if you need one. If you do, then since you're changing things, you might as well do it right.

If your static pressure is too high, you should have a prv. If you have a prv and/or you have a check valve in the water supply, you also need an expansion tank. the proper place for that is on the cold side of the WH somewhere (not on the hot side where it would work, but the heat would make it fail sooner).
 

northman

Member
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
Washington
now have a PRV/expansion tank

wasn't sure if the 125 psi relief was common or not. The previous owner had a solar panel/pre-heat system with all the attending pumps/valves/solenoids for the hot water that was defunct and is now gone. I wasn't sure if the extra T& P had something to do with that or not.
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
It could be that the collectors couldn't handle the higher temp or pressure. Since it is gone, there is no good reason I can think of.
 

Furd

Engineer
Messages
448
Reaction score
1
Points
16
Location
Wet side of Washington State
My house (built in 1987) has a T&P valve plumbed into the hot water supply line just as yours. I always assumed it was in case some bozo didn't install one on the heater itself.

I know that many years ago water heaters were not always fitted with a safety relief valve tapping and it was necessary to install a tee on the hot outlet in order to fit the T&P valve.
 

Terry

The Plumbing Wizard
Staff member
Messages
29,946
Reaction score
3,460
Points
113
Location
Bothell, Washington
Website
terrylove.com
There were some inspectors in 1987 and earlier that required a 125 PSI on the incoming cold line.

In the situation mentioned above, where there is no drain for the water heater relief, except into a bucket, they sometimes add a 125 PSI high enough in the system so that it can be drained by gravity.

At any rate, the water heater should always have a T&P installed.
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks