Does anyone with experience with both Aquia I & Aquia II have any guidance on whether to buy one vs the other? I am leaning toward the II but hesitate because it looks like the I has MAP of 800 vs the II having MAP of 500. I have one bathroom in my flat which is used by my wife and our two toddlers, so both flushing reliability and cleanliness are very important. (I'm also willing to consdier Aquia III if performance justifies it, but would rather not have the ADA height because of the toddlers.)
Aquia I vs II?
- Thread starter loonboy1
- Start date
In the Seattle area, we mainly carry the II and the III
The big difference between those two is height, the III being 1" taller.
The 500 gram rating seems to be fine.
Well, has been fine for some time now.
The Aquia I has a bigger trapway, the downside is that it takes a bit longer to install.
The big difference between those two is height, the III being 1" taller.
The 500 gram rating seems to be fine.
Well, has been fine for some time now.
The Aquia I has a bigger trapway, the downside is that it takes a bit longer to install.
Similar threads
